Page 1 of 1
Something evil is brewing...
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 4:53 pm
by dooda
My camera was hostage taking pictures of budget Break and mufflers all around BC and I haven't had access to my camera for a while. When my dad and bro got back I told them that it might be best to buy me out as I've moved and no longer have immediate access. Today a rain storm recently ended and at dusk I was attracted to the light qualities in the water. After 25 seconds it was the sky that blew me away and the water seems so-so comparitively. This must be the 10th picture I've posted here taken from this balcony. The red light on the left is residue from the city.
Critique and comment is encouraged.
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 4:58 pm
by Glen
Dave, that sky is fantastic
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 5:00 pm
by sirhc55
One word - wow
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 5:02 pm
by the foto fanatic
Great sky!
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 5:08 pm
by Onyx
Nice colours!
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 5:18 pm
by SoCal Steve
Spectacular shot.
Great as is, but IMO the effect would be even greater if you crop a little sky off of the top with a more pano look as a bonus.
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 5:42 pm
by flipfrog
nice one Dave !
great colours, sets a great mood in this image...
i think i know where that was taken from...
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 5:44 pm
by big pix
SoCal Steve wrote:Spectacular shot.
Great as is, but IMO the effect would be even greater if you crop a little sky off of the top with a more pano look as a bonus.
agree a pano look would give the shot more impact.....
cheers
bp
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 6:01 pm
by dooda
Feel free to show me what you're talking about. how much would you crop?
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 6:37 pm
by samester
great vivid colours and i love the glassed out water - nice pic
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 6:48 pm
by SoCal Steve
IMO about like this, Dave.
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 6:56 pm
by Matt. K
I prefer the original. The pano loses its impact on me.
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 8:05 pm
by dooda
hmmm, me too.
What about cropping a little bit less of the sky and more of the trees below? Maybe I'll try a little in the morning (probly not I'm way too lazy).
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 8:19 pm
by dooda
oops, double post. Can't delete it either. Couldn't we delete posts before?
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 8:35 pm
by MCWB
Jaw-dropping stuff Dave, awesome pic!
I'm torn as to whether I prefer the original or the pano, they're both great!
Posted:
Tue May 17, 2005 10:53 pm
by KerryPierce
Very cool pic, Dave.
So, are they buying you out and are you getting a new cam or what? That's a bummer, not having ready access.
Posted:
Wed May 18, 2005 3:13 am
by dooda
yeah, but a new cam is cool though. Got to save a little money though (and I was hoping to get a new Epson p2000 next). It will be nice not having to share a camera with them. It really was a bit of pain only having it on weekends.
Posted:
Wed May 18, 2005 5:26 am
by Neeper
Crazy colors. I like Vancouver a lot. But only to visit.
Posted:
Wed May 18, 2005 8:15 am
by dooda
Yeah, Albertans and British Columbians mix like a Nikon Lens on a Canon body. I sort of like the Albertan American Cowboy style of economics, with the BC sense of green protection (it will never happen). As long as the Liberals stay in power we should be all right.
Posted:
Wed May 18, 2005 8:13 pm
by mudder
Dave, Stunning.
The colour stopped me in my tracks and love the reflections in the water. Print and frame it!
Pano loses something for me...
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 1:29 pm
by stubbsy
Dave
This is one awesome shot. Definitely like the original better than the pano. The colours are just superb.
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 3:05 pm
by Catcha
very impressive, the colours really come out really well, just shows how good timing and great camera and lens can produce
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 4:04 pm
by ozimax
Great colour, reflection, atmosphere, does horizon need straightening? Maybe it's my eyes?
Max
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 4:08 pm
by dooda
You know Ozimax, I really don't think so as I used a tripod and was pretty sure i had it completely level, but I find that sea shots around here can be a little deceiving as the land juts into it making it look crooked. I had a problem with a lighthouse picture once, when I fixed the horizon the lighthouse leaned, and when I made the lighthouse straight the horizon leaned, so i went with the light house as I realized that where the land comes into the horizon it threw me off. Could be wrong with this one though.
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 4:43 pm
by Geoff Marland
This is a great shot Dave and I've got to agree I think the original is the better of the two. The sky gives it more impact.
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 4:55 pm
by Greg B
Fantastic shot Dave, absolutely top notch. Well done
cheers
Fantastic
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 6:29 pm
by Yedrup
A fantastic image. I prefer the original, the cropping seems to reduce the imact of the menace build into such a dramatic sky.
Again, one great image.
Terry
Posted:
Thu May 19, 2005 8:01 pm
by ozimax
dooda wrote:You know Ozimax, I really don't think so as I used a tripod and was pretty sure i had it completely level, but I find that sea shots around here can be a little deceiving as the land juts into it making it look crooked.
Hey Dood, I still reckon that it needs to go 1.5 deg CW, but then again, maybe it's my eyes again? I've looked at photos for ages trying to determine whether or not they need straightening and can never make up my mind! Never mind...
Great shot tho', will have to visit up there one of these days, been as far north as Montana.
Max
Posted:
Wed May 25, 2005 3:23 am
by dooda
Hey Oz,
I just put it through and you're right, the horizon was off just a hair. Thanks for the recommendation (I tend to forget this sometimes which is a no-no when the ocean's horizon is involved.)