DSLRUsers.com

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.

Skip to content

High Key Reflection

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Write comments

High Key Reflection

Postby yeocsa on Sun May 15, 2005 10:50 pm

Image

D70 + AFS 300F4 + TC1.4X + SB800 + Flash Extender. Handheld.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne
Top

Postby big pix on Sun May 15, 2005 11:33 pm

This one is just fantastic.........

cheers
bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.
Top

Postby beetleboy on Mon May 16, 2005 2:43 am

Sorry..doesn't do anything for me. Technical stuff aside (composition, exp etc) it just looks like a poorly metered P&S shot to me. I can see what you were trying to achieve so cred for the idea is due!

Just my opinion, please don't take it personally.

Liam =]

Edit: fixed some 1:16am grammar!
User avatar
beetleboy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Highbury, Adelaide
Top

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Mon May 16, 2005 10:32 am

beetleboy wrote:Sorry..doesn't do anything for me. Technical stuff aside (composition, exp etc) it just looks like a poorly metered P&S shot to me. I can see what you were trying to achieve so cred for the idea is due!

Just my opinion, please don't take it personally.

Liam =]

Edit: fixed some 1:16am grammar!


Hi

No worries. Everyone has different taste. The duck was backlighted from strong sunlight (even it was late afternoon) and so I used flash to fill in the shadows. A P&S shot will result in a black duck.

cheers,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne
Top

Postby the foto fanatic on Mon May 16, 2005 11:04 am

beetleboy wrote:Sorry..doesn't do anything for me. Technical stuff aside (composition, exp etc) it just looks like a poorly metered P&S shot to me. I can see what you were trying to achieve so cred for the idea is due!

Just my opinion, please don't take it personally.

Liam =]

Edit: fixed some 1:16am grammar!


Actually, I'm not sure what beetleboy meant here - 'apart from the composition & exposure, it just looks like a poorly metered P&S shot'. :?: :?:
Must be the 1am posting :lol: :wink:


The use of fill flash to capture this detail in such a strongly back-lit environment is the furtherest thing from a poorly metered shot you could get IMO.

I guess we're so used to seeing high key people portraits that it's unusual to see a duck treated this way.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
Top

Postby beetleboy on Thu May 19, 2005 11:51 pm

Cricketfan, the composition and exposure both are lacking..that's what I meant! To clarify, the composition feels very unbalanced to me (could do with a little more space above the duck to balance it) and the exposure is clearly overcranked causing the colours and detail to wash out! Makes more sense when I post at 10pm!

If it sounds like I'm being harsh it's cos Arthur has produced much better images than this (a couple posted over the couple of days have been very good).

Thanks for comin!
User avatar
beetleboy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 4:57 am
Location: Highbury, Adelaide
Top
Write comments

Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Copyright © 2005 - 2022 Gary Stark


Portal XL 5.0 ~ Plain 0.2