First Posted PicModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
First Posted PicBe slightly gentle but honest
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Re: First Posted PicForeground and subject are great, bokeh is a bit distracting though! Try blurring it more perhaps?
Robboh
I thought exactly the same as Trent - the boke is distracting (NOT your fault - blame the lens) but the pic is great. Much better than my first picture post The composition works really well and the focus is tack sharp. I'd probably clone out the ear that's growing out of kitty's back though Keep up the good work. Are there more from here? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Great shot ...... but a little bit of a straighten up would also be good.......
cheers bp Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Hey, thanks guys.
Agreed about the bokeh and the 'extra ear' The original was a bit soft so has been PP'd a bit and by that stage I had had enough so the ear and background got left alone (I dont really enjoy PP very much as Im not overly good at it and find it quite frustrating). Also had a look at straightening it but the log looked a bit weird to me (plus she was reclining on a bit of a slope). EXIF data: 80-200 @ 200, 2x TC 1/160s @ f3.2 ISO 200 Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Well Marcus - have a look here Both are spellings in current use - mine is just more correct despite being less commonly used. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
If my first post had been as good as this I would have been very proud indeed - well done
Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Ok, Ok! I'll do some more work on it! I'll g-blur the background a bit and turn her into a proper lioness rather than a sawtooth-backed cat
Mic, I dont think Kerry has too much to worry about from me Stubbsy, here are a couple more from the same day that I have access to from work. Basically straight out of the camera with a bit of sharpening. Plus, IIRC, the lioness is basically a 50% crop of a landscape pic. These ones are a bit bigger (~500k). Lemur Lioness The lioness in this one was the one that the 'ear' belonged to. She moved Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Great shot, definitely depth of field / blurring background etc would have better effect but well composed shot with natural frame of tree limbs, may look even better without border at all?
Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Very cool shot, Rob.
For a full critique, I'll add to what the others have said. The shot looks to be about -.3 to -.6EV underexposed on the important parts. The sidelighting is the problem and the right side of the cat looks about right. I'd brighten up the face, ears and other shadow areas a tad, doing double brighten on the cat's eyes with a selection of just the eyes. Cloning the ear out of the background would be easy stuff, if you fix the background first. It's easy to fix because there's not a lot of it. Select the OOF areas with a slight feather and apply a decent gaussian blur. That should fix your broken bokeh. Then select, with a slight to medium feather, a square area, just to the right of the ear on the back, making sure that you catch a little of the cat's back. Promote the selection to a layer, twice, and then move one over to cover the ear and the other to cover the white circle. Erase any of the promoted selections that don't fit properly. Then flatten. Here's a quickie to demo what I mean. The differences are rather subtle, but effective, I think. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
The Lemur is good - better when cropped when you PP. Shame about the tree branch in the lioness shot as the expression on her face is great. Thanks for sharing the pics & keep up the good work. PS If it helps any I don't really undersatnd everything Kerry says either and I've been PPing in Photoshop for a while Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks for all the comments and help guys! Appreciated!!
Kerry. Thank you for the tips. How do you normally do your selections, with the pen tool, or the magic lasso?? I'll have a go at making these changes on the original and then repost for critique. Mic. Only two there ever are, a master and apprentice Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
G'day Rob,
I'm a sucker for any animal shots and this is bloody great! Wow, the first posts are getting really good these days Strewth, miine would have been a shocker It's a bit tricky trying to get the best exposure when there's "hot spots" of white fur on animals under side lighting but I think you've done great with this... Aren't Lemur's full of character? They're terrific subjects... Looking forward to more of these... Aka Andrew
Andrew,
Thanks for the kinds words. The original pic isn't particularly good technically and got saved by RAW and PP really. I do have to admit that Im a sucker for animal shots as well As for the Lemur's, I love photographing them. They would have to be my favourite subject, though as you say, quite frustrating to photograph. They are as mad as hatters and very fast. They have high contrast colouring and so its VERY easy to blow out the fur around their faces. But that all makes for good practise Rob. Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Robbo, I have previously commented on your great 1st shot but should'nt it be a sheep?
Stubbsy.....Yeah popular opinion obviously states that you beat MCWB. All the way with Bokeh!! I know nutzinc
I don't mean to be obtuse, obscene or obliterated when I talk about this stuff. Anytime I say something that doesn't make sense or you want more info, please ask. I try not to be condescending or overly techie, but it's a hard row to hoe when trying to explain this stuff. I don't get offended, so don't hold back on that account. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Wow, Mic. I'm certainly no master at any part of this game. When you take enough bad images, even the slowest thought process is bound to pick up some tricks along the way. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
You're welcome, Rob. The image will dictate the type of selection used. For example, large detailed, areas of high contrast can be quickly selected with the magic lasso and then fine tuned with the pen tool. Other areas can be quickly roughed out with the pen tool, before fine tuning. I frequently combine the use of both tools. For this image, the areas to be selected are small, so I used the pen tool with a 2 or 3 feather, IIRC, for the background OOF areas. I then applied a gaussian blur of 1.5. I used the pen tool to make a rough rectangular selection, just to the right of the ear on the back. The rectangle was slightly larger than the ear, with a feather of about 4 or 5. If I'm not making it easy for you to follow, please say so and I'll give it another go, with step by step examples. The stuff isn't hard to do, but it is frequently hard to visualize from brief written instructions. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
EDIT: On reflection, the joke I posted in here wasnt particularly tasteful and might have been taken the wrong way. It was intended as a good-natured response to the good-natured dig above. Apologies to anyone who might have been offended. Rob. Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Previous topic • Next topic
22 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|