a couple more macros, Nikkor 70-180

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

a couple more macros, Nikkor 70-180

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:20 am

Nikon D70s ,Nikkor 70-180mm f/4.5-5.6D AF ED Micro
1/500s f/40.0 at 180.0mm with Flash hand held

Image
Nikon D70s ,Nikkor 70-180mm f/4.5-5.6D AF ED Micro
1/500s f/40.0 at 180.0mm with Flash hand held

Image
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby MHD on Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:34 am

hmmm.... Both very good... did you use a diffuser, flash on the first one seems a bit harsh...

Its hard to say which one I like better, I like the critter in the first one but I like the lighting on the flower on the second one...
Nice work
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:38 am

I like them both - but that is one mean looking muther in the second pic 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Oneputt on Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:45 am

Lovely fresh shots, both of them :D
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Mon Jun 06, 2005 11:02 am

I like the second one. Sharp and constrasty. In the first one, the wings of the butt are not within the dof.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby tcsphoto on Mon Jun 06, 2005 11:22 am

Second one is really good. That bee is sharp. How did you get it to pose for you?
User avatar
tcsphoto
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 11:02 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Postby Catcha on Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:14 pm

Ugly buggers arn't they :D , second shots looks great and the colours come through really well
Ben Yu

D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!!

Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
User avatar
Catcha
Senior Member
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:36 am
Location: Darwin, Northern Territory Was the only true open speed limts in Australia

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:13 pm

Kerry

These are excellent. The second one is better because of DOF issues in the first, but you'd expect that since the butterfly in the first is front on, whereas the wasp in the second is more cooperative and side on. I'd be happy if I could get something half as good as either of these.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby stormygirl on Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:34 pm

Wow Kerry, these are magnificent! The colours are amazing, and the detail superb...mean looking critters! I really like the water droplets too.
User avatar
stormygirl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby KerryPierce on Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:28 pm

Many thanks to all, for the kind comments. :D

As to the first photo, the moth was not very large, not a lot bigger than the wasp, prolly less than 50% larger in body. Still, I was maxed out at f/40 on both shots, so nothing else can be done for DOF. :)

MHD: No diffuser was used on the flash. These shots were in full, bright daylight, in the mid afternoon. The combination of shutter speed and f/stop was a huge, light eating, monster and I had a number of shots that were underexposed as it was.

These shots were basically experimental. I've never used the flash like this before, at such high shutter speeds. The high shutter speeds were to reduce hand held camera shake and motion blur of the subjects that moved far more rapidly than I could keep up with, either by themselves or in gusts of wind that would take them completely out of the frame. :(
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques