a couple more macros, Nikkor 70-180Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
a couple more macros, Nikkor 70-180Nikon D70s ,Nikkor 70-180mm f/4.5-5.6D AF ED Micro
1/500s f/40.0 at 180.0mm with Flash hand held Nikon D70s ,Nikkor 70-180mm f/4.5-5.6D AF ED Micro 1/500s f/40.0 at 180.0mm with Flash hand held my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
hmmm.... Both very good... did you use a diffuser, flash on the first one seems a bit harsh...
Its hard to say which one I like better, I like the critter in the first one but I like the lighting on the flower on the second one... Nice work New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Second one is really good. That bee is sharp. How did you get it to pose for you?
Tom(tcsphoto)
http://tcsphoto.smugmug.com/ Join and save http://www.smugmug.com/?referrer=JX9ONDzzLhczc
Ugly buggers arn't they , second shots looks great and the colours come through really well
Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
Kerry
These are excellent. The second one is better because of DOF issues in the first, but you'd expect that since the butterfly in the first is front on, whereas the wasp in the second is more cooperative and side on. I'd be happy if I could get something half as good as either of these. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Wow Kerry, these are magnificent! The colours are amazing, and the detail superb...mean looking critters! I really like the water droplets too.
Many thanks to all, for the kind comments.
As to the first photo, the moth was not very large, not a lot bigger than the wasp, prolly less than 50% larger in body. Still, I was maxed out at f/40 on both shots, so nothing else can be done for DOF. MHD: No diffuser was used on the flash. These shots were in full, bright daylight, in the mid afternoon. The combination of shutter speed and f/stop was a huge, light eating, monster and I had a number of shots that were underexposed as it was. These shots were basically experimental. I've never used the flash like this before, at such high shutter speeds. The high shutter speeds were to reduce hand held camera shake and motion blur of the subjects that moved far more rapidly than I could keep up with, either by themselves or in gusts of wind that would take them completely out of the frame. my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|