Some more aquarium macros.Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Some more aquarium macros.Nothing too flash but a few pics of critters in my aquarium with interesting textures and colours:
fungia coral (no flash through glass on tripod) and exhalent and inhalent siphons of a squamosa giant clam (remote SB800 from above taken handheld) Any suggestions/comments most welcome.
To me ,the first one looks soft and grainy, especially compared to the results of the next one, those fungias really do look alien like that. The squammy mantle looks good though, although i think the last one loses a bit from DOF loss as the mantle disappears. I still have some shrimp living inside one of my clams that I need to get a decent pic of, seems like the 105 lens wil ldo the job nicely.
Hi Finno,
Thanks for the reply. The graininess is a result of ISO1600. Unfortunately under 150W metal halides it is necessary to push the ISO up which reults in noise. I agree with your DOF observation. Unfortunately it was unavoidable as due to the height of the aquarium the clam shots were hand held which in turn necessitated a fairly large aperture (f7 off the top of my head) to obtain a suitably fast shutter speed. I will try ro reshoot both subjects in the near future to see if I can improve. I wish I had commensal shrimp they would make for an ultra cool subject. I do have a few commensal acro crabs but they are very timid and hard to capture due to the density of the colonies. BTW how are you going with your macro lense decision making process? Are you leaning in any particular direction?
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|