Page 1 of 1

Bird on a bard wire

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:36 pm
by yeocsa
Image

Water Treatment Plant Entrance.

regards,

Arthur

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:47 pm
by PiroStitch
Great capture Arthur! :D

Btw, it's barb wire ;) Unless the wire was reciting poetry...then that's a different story :P

Just wondering, this is something the bird photographers would be able to answer, how come some of the birds even though they're still, still have their feathers appearing to be blurred? Is it just the shutter speed being slow or were the birds moving? Sorry not meaning to sound rude or criticse the bird images, but just wanted to know :)

Hi

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:55 pm
by yeocsa
I am not sure. The bird was chirping away. Could be camera shake too.
Picture is heavily cropped.

1/160 at f8. Focal Lenght 420mm. Handheld. Flash used.

No chance to use tripod. Several pacific swallows flew away and only this guy remains. Managed at a snapshot before all is gone.

regards,

Arthur

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:02 pm
by PiroStitch
Ahh gotcha :) Not a criticism against you or your photos Arthur :) It's just an observation I've noticed over the past few weeks. They are fast moving critters ;)

Hi

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:06 pm
by yeocsa
PiroStitch wrote:Ahh gotcha :) Not a criticism against you or your photos Arthur :) It's just an observation I've noticed over the past few weeks. They are fast moving critters ;)


Hi

No worries. all comments welcome. it helps to sharpen my skills.

appreciate your observation.

cheers,

Arthur

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:06 pm
by kipper
Really depends on the crop factor I find Piro.

I'd like to see how much the Canon guys crop using IS, because I've seen a lot of sharp shots of small critters. Then again most of them using 400, 500, 600 IS with TC.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:09 pm
by kipper
Btw we're pretty sure that's a White Winged Triller. Correct me if I'm wrong Nicole.

Hi

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 10:33 am
by yeocsa
Thanks, Darryl for the ID.

regards,

Arthur

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:49 pm
by redline
looks great arthur,
how much cropping was there on this pic? looks a bit soft on the head was it car vibration?

Hi

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:55 pm
by yeocsa
redline wrote:looks great arthur,
how much cropping was there on this pic? looks a bit soft on the head was it car vibration?


Hi Redline,

less than 20% of the picture i think. Softness is not due to car vibration. It is due to handholding and bird's movement. The bird was chirping and the body especially near the neck would expand. Shutter speed was very slow at 1/160 for focal lenght of 420mm. No time to up the speed as they all flew away very quickly.

regards,

Arthur

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 3:03 pm
by bouyant_clown
Yeocsa,
was there much wind around whilst taking the photograph? a moderate breeze would ruffle the feathers, especially as the bird has them puffed out. this may explain the slight blur?

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:31 pm
by mic
Nice Duck Artie :wink:

Hope he has good shoes on :roll:

Mic. :wink:

Nice Little Capture.

Hi

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 7:37 pm
by yeocsa
redline wrote:looks great arthur,
how much cropping was there on this pic? looks a bit soft on the head was it car vibration?


Image

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 7:46 pm
by Nicole
Btw we're pretty sure that's a White Winged Triller. Correct me if I'm wrong Nicole.


I still think that is what it is. It also goes by the name of Horsfield's Bronze-Cuckoo.

I think it was a combination of handholding at the shutter speed and cropping. It was a nice start to the morning.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 9:31 pm
by robboh
I know this sounds strange, but just looking at the cropping pic you showed, I think that the uncropped original or only slightly cropped version would look great!