A few odd shots with the 80-200mm VR

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A few odd shots with the 80-200mm VR

Postby Matt. K on Sat Jul 02, 2005 10:33 pm

Image
Image
Image

This is a very nice lens to use and optically excellent.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby robw25 on Sat Jul 02, 2005 11:09 pm

yep... i loved the sharpness of the photo's when i used to use mine ... i really only use the 85 1.4 and the 200-400vr now ..

cheers rob
User avatar
robw25
Senior Member
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: whyalla south australia

Postby robboh on Sat Jul 02, 2005 11:59 pm

robw25 wrote:yep... i loved the sharpness of the photo's when i used to use mine ... i really only use the 85 1.4 and the 200-400vr now .. cheers rob

that thing must be a b***h to handhold....
Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
User avatar
robboh
Member
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Postby robw25 on Sun Jul 03, 2005 12:14 am

i cant hand hold it !!! i need a monopod to use it .... but what a lens !!!!!!

cheers rob
User avatar
robw25
Senior Member
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: whyalla south australia

Postby Matt. K on Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:43 pm

OOOOps! I meant the 80-400mm VR. :oops: :oops:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Onyx on Sun Jul 03, 2005 5:30 pm

Second one with bright colours definite my fav.

Third one I can see prominent halo, detracts from it IMHO.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby SteveGriffin on Sun Jul 03, 2005 5:31 pm

Nice work. Good thing that there isn't a 80-200 VR or all of the troops would have been lusting after that one as well :twisted:
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques