Variations on a Theme (Please Vote)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Which image do you prefer???

1.
5
19%
2.
0
No votes
3.
6
23%
4.
13
50%
5.
0
No votes
6. Just for Mic :-)
2
8%
 
Total votes : 26

Variations on a Theme (Please Vote)

Postby leek on Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:06 am

OK... All of these images originate from the same NEF file...
Just experimenting with various PP options...
Please vote for your favourite (and a brief comment in a reply as to why...)

1. Image
2. Image
3. Image
4. Image
5. Image
6. Image
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:12 am

Number one because it has lots of intense colour, which i like.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:50 am

#4 - as all the other ones are a bit too off. #2 is too dark for my liking. I like the sky in #2 though.
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby stubbsy on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:20 am

John

I voted for #4 because the blue greys seem to work best colour wise.

#1 looks unnaturally orange, #2 is way too dark, #3 is too yellow, #5 is unnatural (curves are wrong) #6 - I have an allergy to the pills :wink:

But I have to say the image doesn't work for me because of that damned tree in the foreground.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Frankenstein on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:24 am

Killakoala wrote:Number one because it has lots of intense colour, which i like.


SAME HERE
My photo gallery: http://www.frankalvaro.net
>>>> Nikon D300...Nikon 18-200 VR...Sigma 10-20...Tamron 90mm macro <<<<
"I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about. " Peter Griffin
User avatar
Frankenstein
Senior Member
 
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: Ruse (Sydney)

Postby Glen on Thu Jun 30, 2005 11:25 am

#3 or #6 if you are selling the building on location
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby bago100 on Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:46 pm

As Glen says, if you are selling then number 6 reeks of 'residential'

But for natural looks you can't go past number 4 in my humble opinion

All are interesting variations though

Cheers

Graham
User avatar
bago100
Senior Member
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Shanghai China until Feb 2010

Postby Greg B on Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:00 pm

Number 3 for me.

Number 6 for mic.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby big pix on Thu Jun 30, 2005 8:21 pm

No 4 as it is the most natural in colour but could do with some work in ACR or PP a bit more saturation would help to improve this image.......

cheers
bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby leek on Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:18 pm

Thanks for the comments... hope you found it interesting...

Just for the record, here's how the shot came out of the D70:
Image

Most of the variations were done using different settings of exposure, hue / saturation & the last one with curves... All done in ACR 3.1 before opening in Photoshop... No sharpening or anything else applied in PS...

It's fun to experiment - especially when it's raining...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby leek on Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:25 pm

Sorry... told a lie...

This is actually how it came out of the D70:
Image
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby big pix on Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:34 pm

if you have PSCS2 you can straighten the verticals using the crop tool........choose crop, tick perspective, use the cornors of the cropped area to align with the building, choose crop.........one straight pix.....

cheers
bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby leek on Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:46 pm

bp... Yep... I saw that tip on your post on Embi's morning pic... A very handy... Is that similar to the lens correction in Nikon Capture?

I'll have to pay more attention in all the new goodness that is packed into CS2...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Matt. K on Thu Jun 30, 2005 9:57 pm

No 4 because all the others seem slightly fake.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby big pix on Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:06 pm

do not use Nikon Capture as PSCS2 has so much more.....Photoshop has lens correction as well and other ways to correct an image.......
go Select All
Edit
Transform.....this will give you 6 diferent ways to play with an image, but try distort, perspective, warp as starting points

cheers
bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby mic on Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:16 pm

Leek, do not listen to these people, they are leading you up the garden path with 57% :x Fooey. It is obvious.

6 is the best.

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby leek on Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:50 pm

mic wrote:Leek, do not listen to these people, they are leading you up the garden path with 57% :x Fooey. It is obvious.

6 is the best.

Mic. :wink:


Thought you might like that one... but did you notice the way it was only half inverted... Strange but true... ;-)
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby PiroStitch on Fri Jul 01, 2005 1:45 am

I like #3 but for a nice and even pic, combine #3 and #6. The inverted building number actually looks better. Try combining the building number with the rest of #3 and bump up the saturation like you did for #1 :)
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques