Majestic....... seagulls?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Majestic....... seagulls?Some shots I took while taking surfing photos when waves were not going on. Turned out to be the best photos of the outing I think.
Also a couple of skies: The end of the world is nigh: I think the stair image has potential, but I can't get the PP right? Maybe it's just when I took the image I thought it would work better and it doesn't? Comments appreciated. - Nick
Gallery
I like shots of birds, particularly ones in flight.
of the 2 in flight, I like the bird in the first shot much better than the second shot, but I find the light coming off the water to be very distracting. I find myself searching for the subject. In the second there is less depth of field and light coming off the water and I find the bird easily as the subject without the distractions. Perhaps tone down the water in shot one. Bird in flight 2 perhaps needed some fill flash though. Just my opinion of course.
I REALLY like the first night shot you've posted. It's very confusing to work out what you're looking @ perspective wise, but very clear about what it is.
The first Birdy is also my fav of the lot. I find a lot of the other shots to be quite distracting due to the 'busy' backgrounds. The contrast of the foreground and background in the first shto makes it 'punchier' to me. Which is why I like it. --Wadem
Select the sky area with the magic wand , then play with levels or curves, bingo a better image.......
cheers bp Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Will give that a try BP.
Agreed on the busy backgrounds in the first flight shot, might try tone it down a little. The first sky shot was actually taken in broad daylight, it's just had shadow contrast increased tons. Thanks for the comments. - Nick
Gallery
G'day Nick,
Of the bird ones, I like the last three with the strong reflections in the wet sand... But that shot "world is nigh", woah those clouds Looks like an underwater shot of a wave from underneath, sort of... umm... Aka Andrew
Previous topic • Next topic
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|