12 Apostle pano's

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

12 Apostle pano's

Postby mudder on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:27 pm

G'day all,

Was mucking around with a couple of pano's (yep, Autostitch) and anted to hear your thoughts on these ones for PP suggestions...

Taken down at Port Campbell (der!) nice light but frustratingly either didn't take them, deleted them them, or simply not taken the one to the left cos I can't find the bloody NEFs :cry:
Image

This one I'm not yet sure on the sky, or whether the cliffs need something on the left hand side...
Image

Your thoughts would be appreciated so go for it :shock:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:56 pm

I prefer the first one. Strong colour. More dramatic.

The sky for the second one seem dull.

regards,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:04 pm

Hi Mudder
nice shots. I personally prefer the scene/composition of the 2nd pic, but the bold colouring of the 1st.

Perhaps you can artificially PP the 2nd to have the golden colours in the rock ?!? I actually don't mind the sky of the 2nd pic either. The cliff on the LHS could maybe do with some more contrast to bring it out a little.

Would be interested to see an update to this if you decide to PP again...

EDIT:
it got the better of me and I had a little play, hope you dont mind:

Image

I adjusted levels, added saturation on rocks, added shadow/highlights on both rocks and trees on top of cliff and did some USM (using high-pass filter method)
Last edited by Aussie Dave on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby redline on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:22 pm

i would like to more of the first pic mudder, it just seems that the middle stone/pillar it too much in the middle. maybe a tad soft too, might be jpeg softness though.

did you have any more of the left side?

look like you choose the right time too shoot, great colors
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby mudder on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:37 pm

That looks great Dave, go for it :) I always whoos out on the sharpening and levels thinking big print but that looks great! I've only used a light high-pass and no USM, looks good big but I always look at a large print and think I could've sharpened "that area" more, or gee "that area" needs levels or something... Ahh well...

Redline... :cry: I dan't find the NEF's to the left, there's a gap in the files if you know what I mean, I've been looking :cry:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Aussie Dave on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:44 pm

The more we practice, the better we get I suppose... If it was too easy, we'd be off playing sport or something crazy like that :-)

How big did you print it out ??
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby mudder on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:51 pm

Aussie Dave wrote:...How big did you print it out ??


That one was 10"x23" or so I think... Looks great but was quickly done as an example of some stuff I did for the Zoo thing, but it's hanging in the bar for now :D Looks sharp as a tack when printed well...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Re: 12 Apostle pano's

Postby big pix on Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:59 pm

mudder wrote:G'day all,
, deleted them them, or simply not taken the one to the left cos I can't find the bloody NEFs :cry:
:shock:
\

ALL THE MORE REASON FOR MANAGING YOU DIGITAL WORK FLOW

Cheers
bp
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby mudder on Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:02 pm

I think I just mustn't have taken them, but there's a suspicious gap in the filenames of the NEFs.... Now, when I have a red at the bar I keep thinking about "the one to the left" :lol:
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby mic on Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:52 pm

Hey Mudder,

I prefer your Pano & keep the glow of the clouds in the 1st.

Somehow.

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby Catcha on Sat Jul 02, 2005 11:57 am

First one is a great shot with it zoomed more closer compared the second one it. The colors are great
Ben Yu

D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!!

Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
User avatar
Catcha
Senior Member
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:36 am
Location: Darwin, Northern Territory Was the only true open speed limts in Australia

Postby ozimax on Sat Jul 02, 2005 2:39 pm

Yellowish tinge of #1 is great, what a place to take photos! Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Pano Shots

Postby marcotrov on Sat Jul 02, 2005 3:32 pm

I liked the composition and effect of the second pano better. i hope you don't mind i added a little more mood and drama as a thought and could only think of getting it on pixspot to view. great shots though! Loved to be there!!
http://www.pixspot.com/displayimage.php ... at=0&pos=0
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby xerubus on Sun Jul 03, 2005 7:57 pm

time to go and take the shots again from the same location... one less apostle now....
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby gstark on Sun Jul 03, 2005 8:51 pm

Mark,

xerubus wrote:time to go and take the shots again from the same location... one less apostle now....


Yep.

Hands up those who were there this morning to capture that decisive moment? :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby stubbsy on Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:22 pm

gstark wrote:Mark,

xerubus wrote:time to go and take the shots again from the same location... one less apostle now....


Yep.

Hands up those who were there this morning to capture that decisive moment? :)

Missed this in the news. Just went and read up on this at abc.net.au. Liked this quote "Numerous ads and promotions featuring the 12 apostles may now have to be re-shot" PS There were nine, now there are 8 apostles
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kipper on Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:43 pm

Lol, how pathetic is it, one structure disappears so they have to reshoot all their promotional images. Why will somebody sue them if they turn up expecting 9 and they only get 8!@??
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Atorie on Sun Jul 03, 2005 9:48 pm

well here's an image from abc.com.au

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200507/r51532_137756.jpg

Little bit sad... my fiance left at 5am this morning for a road trip along the GOR with three of her friends... she'll be devisated.
Last edited by Atorie on Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Michael
~~~~~
User avatar
Atorie
Member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Brisbane - Nikon D60

Postby Greg B on Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:12 am

My favourite report so far - some tourist complaining..

We came to see the twelve apostles, then we find out there is only nine, now there is only eight.

(And they were seriously complaining!!!)

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby gstark on Mon Jul 04, 2005 12:32 pm

Greg B wrote:My favourite report so far - some tourist complaining..

We came to see the twelve apostles, then we find out there is only nine, now there is only eight.

(And they were seriously complaining!!!)

:lol: :lol: :lol:


One wonders if they can count?

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby mudder on Mon Jul 04, 2005 12:35 pm

Wow, looks like some of the shots I've got from down at Port Campbell are keepers now... I must admit, when-ever I've seen them, I've always been amazed at the fact they're still standing... Matter of time I suppose...

Then again, the cliff face along the shore is made of the same stuff, so you never know, we might be up to a bakers dozen in a few years if the cliff face starts breakin' up a bit ;)
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby leek on Mon Jul 04, 2005 12:39 pm

I heard a VIC tourism guy on the radio this morning saying that there was a group of 4 stacks further up the coast and if the apostles kept collapsing at this rate, they might need to adopt those four to keep the numbers up... :-)

Useless trivia: the structures (and a close by island) used to be called the Sow & Piglets, but the name was changed in the 50s as a marketing tool...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques