Waterfall shots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Waterfall shots

Postby johnd on Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:04 pm

I took a few shots the other day with D70, 50mm f1.4 lens, cpl and photomerged them. I was quite pleased with the results except for the blown highlights in the portrait one. Just too much dynamic range.

Comments most welcome.

Image

Image


Cheers :)
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby rokkstar on Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:10 pm

First one does it for me John. I'm a sucker for long exposures of waterfalls, and a sucker for panoramic format. Love them. Nice job
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby spartikus on Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:25 pm

The first one for me as well, John - the palm overhanging in front of the second shot takes a bit away from it, but the lovely contrast in colours is great!
Chris
photoblog
User avatar
spartikus
Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Perth, W.A. - dee-seventy

Postby WadeM on Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:32 pm

first one for me, much better colours!

Would of been a fun shoot!

Thanks,
--Wade
WadeM
Member
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:36 pm
Location: .syd.au.

Postby Hlop on Fri Jul 08, 2005 5:08 pm

John,

First one will do for me. Did you bracket it? What was the difference in exposures? 1 stop? More? Less?
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby darb on Fri Jul 08, 2005 5:36 pm

beaut shots
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby johnd on Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:14 pm

Thanks for the feedback all. It was an interesting experiment.
First part of the expirement was taking landscape shots with a 50mm prime lens rather than something with a wider angle.
The second part was to make multiple exposures and stitch them together to give something that I could print pretty big without loosing quality.

The cpl really makes a difference with waterfalls. The same shots without a cpl a few weeks back were very ordinary.

Both the images are from the same group of 17 exposures, panning across the waterfall in 3 groups of 5 or 6. The bottom group of 6 exposures made the panorama. 5 exposures from the bottom group and 5 from the top group made the portrait. I didn't need the middle group of exposures as there was enough overlap between the top and bottom groups.

No bracketing. All 17 exposures taken at f5.6, 1.3 secs, raw, manual, AF, cpl.

The auto focus was a bit of a problem, making it difdicult to stitch the left hand images. The next time I go back, I'm going to try autofocus on the central part of the waterfall then change to manual, so all exposures will have identical focus.

It was a lot of fun doing it and I intend printing them and if they look OK, printing them big. The panorama ended up 6000pix X 3000pix, so I hope to be able to print it up to 30" wide without loosing any quality.


Cheers :)
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Jenno on Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:30 pm

Excellent shots John - Postcard material
Like 'em both.
Where is the waterfall?

Ray
User avatar
Jenno
Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:15 pm
Location: The Hills District Sydney

Postby meicw on Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:25 pm

Great shots, both of them. They both capture the 'feel' of the rain forest.

Regards
Meicw
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby johnd on Fri Jul 08, 2005 8:20 pm

Jenno wrote:Where is the waterfall?

Ray


Ray, it's a few minutes drive from Hobart, on the slopes of Mt Wellington.

Tasmania has got some fantastic scenery. I'm slowly getting around it with my D70 at the ready.

Cheers :)
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby mudder on Fri Jul 08, 2005 8:38 pm

G'day John,
Wow, these are great. Heavy sat, love the framing of the fern in the second, they look like they'd blow up really well detailed and sharp with great colour.

I like pano's and a sucker for water shots, this is terrific, which s/w package did you use? By photomerge do you mean CS (or CS2) etc?

Cheers.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby johnd on Fri Jul 08, 2005 9:44 pm

mudder wrote:which s/w package did you use? By photomerge do you mean CS (or CS2) etc?


G'day Andrew. I used CS2. Just got it the olther day. I'm going to try the same panorama in Panorama Factory to see if there's any difference.

Cheers :)
John
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby ozimax on Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:25 pm

Wonderful pano John (1st one), I think this one is outstanding, you must have a monster computer to muscle up enough power to do this pano from RAW files?

Max
President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
User avatar
ozimax
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5289
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 11:58 am
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW

Postby PiroStitch on Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:30 pm

Def. the first pano does it for me too :) All thumbs up
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby mic on Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:14 pm

Portrait for me,

Top shot. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby Catcha on Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:22 pm

The second one would look better if you the branch was not in the way
Ben Yu

D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!!

Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
User avatar
Catcha
Senior Member
 
Posts: 787
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:36 am
Location: Darwin, Northern Territory Was the only true open speed limts in Australia


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques