Fire & EarthModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Fire & EarthTwo abstract shots.
The first one was taken in the sand dunes at Stockton Beach. The second outside a restaurant in Nelson Bay. Click an image for a larger version. I'd be interested in your comments whether these work for you or not. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Re: Fire & EarthVery tastefully done!
Looks like a very photogenic place
Thanks Wendell. No comments on the fact it's an arty shot from "Mr Representational photography"
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter,
Where's the photo of the Forrester stuck in sand? Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
I like the pano crop for the second shot. I found it interesting.
The top shot - very bright. Be interesting to see what a little extra shadow would do to it? Also i dont like the tire tracks. If they were running up and down they might be a little more interesting. The viewer might wonder where they were going? Across the screen didnt do it for me.
Peter,
The second one presents an image of a couple dancing to me. Very tasteful, very nice. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Interesting perspectives. I like the flame and what it seems to offer the imagination. I think the sand has potential in the area of texture with a little less exposure and more contrast.
cheers marco
I like both of them as is, Stubbsy.
The first one is soothing in a weird way. Certainly not the green fertile savanna that is suppose to make humans feel safe, but what the hell. The second one makes me "Curious Yellow." If you get my reference. Cheers, SoCal Steve Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.
You mean this Forrester? Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
1st is quite interesting yet so simple....nice
Ben Yu
D300,SB800,Sigma 10-20,Mini Trekker Classic,Nova 3,Ixus 55 Other toys coming very soon..stayed tuned !!!! Check out my site http://byu88.smugmug.com<>http://photobucket.com/byu88
two thumbs up for the second shot mate... well done.
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|