Page 1 of 1
Experiments in boredom
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:55 am
by Nnnnsic
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:52 am
by Charlie Chalk
very interesting....
....looking at that last one, you could probably do with blowing your nose too!
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 11:45 am
by Andoru
Blair Witch 3?
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:56 pm
by sirhc55
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:02 pm
by stubbsy
Leigh - very interesting - I wish you'd post more of your work and talk less (might help me pass your post count that way
). This stuff is really interesting and I'd like to know more about the mechanics of what you did (eg to get the grain - or was it just high ISO)
BTW I too want to clean your nose. Maybe next time do it when you don't have a cold
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:20 pm
by gstark
stubbsy wrote: I'd like to know more about the mechanics of what you did (eg to get the grain - or was it just high ISO)
Grain ??
What grain?
That's how he normally looks.
Please do not adjust your sets. The fault is in .....
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:45 pm
by sheepie
stubbsy wrote:...I too want to clean your nose.
???? I just don't want to think about that!
I like the concept leigh - very intrigueing (SP? feeling too crappy to care!), and they show some of your unique character!
More info on settings, etc would be appreciated - as others have said, the grain really works well - added to counteract the dust bunnies, or a by-product of IR / high ISO?
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:44 pm
by wendellt
Leigh
5 is the best
but since they are all experiments in the uberzone
I love them all!
one question how did you get a 50mm filter on a 28mm lens, you use blu-tac? I did on the kit lens
It's good to see that the 'white dot' phenomenon does not happen in your shots, my 50mm lens must be at fault.
fellow alchemist go forth and experiment!
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:33 pm
by Nnnnsic
The 24mm lens, like the 50mm, uses the same 52mm filter thread, so I just stuck it on that lens instead of the 50mm.
There are other lenses besides the 50mm you can stick it on, I just opted to use the 24mm.
For the most part, I was shooting (especially in the last two images) at 800-1600 ISO's with 30 seconds at f22, as well as the double rear flash effect, occasionally shooting off of mirrors, so yeah, the high ISO was what was causing the grainy-ness and, aside for the dust bunnies, turned out fairly well.
I did get annoyed at myself for the fifth image for not including the whole of the face, but when you're shooting without any idea, that happens.
The fifth was my favourite too and reminded me of the sort of image you see from a Western.
However, the images got the following treatments within Photoshop: colour replacements, curves, channel mixing, colour balancing, and greyscaling (duh).
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:36 pm
by Greg B
Not bad, but I notice that some of you stuff is not razor sharp, and the colour is not well defined.
Also, the cat looks either scared or confused - probably both.
I suspect that you are looking into the lens instead of the viewfinder - reference to the manual should assist.
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:38 pm
by Nnnnsic
It wasn't meant to be sharp.
Instead of mounting the filter onto the camera before each shot, I was just leaving the filter on and shooting blind.
And yeah, the cat was confused. It's the neighbours cat and it just wanted warmth and food, not a flash and a dangling camera strap.
And when you've mixed the colours as much as I had, what colour remained would be odd as it was.
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:53 pm
by Greg B
Greg B wrote:.... but I notice that some of you stuff is not razor sharp, and the colour is not well defined.....
In the words of the late great Kennedy G., "That's a joke, Joyce"
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:55 pm
by stubbsy
Greg B wrote:Greg B wrote:.... but I notice that some of you stuff is not razor sharp, and the colour is not well defined.....
In the words of the late great Kennedy G., "That's a joke, Joyce"
Don't worry Greg, I well and trully understood it as I'm sure most would. Leigh is not super well
ATM (head cold) so probably isn't his usual effervescent self (he was even quiet at the mini meet on Saturday
)
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:29 pm
by gstark
Greg B wrote:Greg B wrote:.... but I notice that some of you stuff is not razor sharp, and the colour is not well defined.....
In the words of the late great Kennedy G., "That's a joke, Joyce"
Sycamore 1 has occasionally - very occasionally - been known to be a little slow on the uptake, Greg.
Especially on any one of the seven well established days of the week.
Re: Picture Project...is it useful? Is it worth loading?
Posted:
Mon Jul 18, 2005 5:30 pm
by gstark
stubbsy wrote:Matt. K wrote:Anybody out there use PictureProject and does it do the job?
Droll Matt, very droll
Yep I've heard it's a great little utility and worth every cent you pay for it.
Double, even!