The moon thru the clouds (2 img)

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The moon thru the clouds (2 img)

Postby Aussie Dave on Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:37 pm

Went outside to throw the rubbish out and noticed a hole in the clouds where the moon was peeking through......so of course I bolted inside to grab camera & tripod.

Here are 2 of the better ones:

Image

Image

Thought I'd share :-)

Comments/thoughts welcomed...
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby Heath Bennett on Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:16 pm

nice atmospheric pics aus
HB
User avatar
Heath Bennett
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:49 pm
Location: Morisset/Bonnells Bay

Postby stubbsy on Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:59 pm

Dave

Nice pics - prefer the first - more clouds apparent so more atmospheric PS> Are you married? If so, why are you puttin out the garbage? :lol:



... ducks behind monitor :twisted:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby bloop on Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:01 am

I like the centred composition of the first one better... I thought about doing the same thing but it's freezing in Sydney!

Do you have any pictures close enough to see the craters?
User avatar
bloop
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:06 am
Location: Chipping Norton, NSW

Postby Aussie Dave on Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:58 am

thanks guys.

Stubbsy - I am married, which is why "I" was taking out the garbage :roll:

Bloop - unfortunately, I was shooting through a layer of clouds so the moon isn't very detailed when highly cropped (which is what I need to do with only a 300mm lens).

It was also cold down here in Melbourne, but I figure you have to take these opportunities when they arise. I thought about just going back inside where it was warm, but the little voice inside my head kept saying "you'll be thinking about the shot for the rest of the night, wishing you had taken it".....so I did.

Crazy ? YES. But who of us here aren't crazy when it comes to our beloved camera ?!?!?
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby paulvdb1 on Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:34 am

bloop wrote:I like the centred composition of the first one better... I thought about doing the same thing but it's freezing in Sydney!

Do you have any pictures close enough to see the craters?

I took a shot with the same lens a couple of days ago and yes you do get to see craters fairly well. I'll have to play some more with apertures though as my shot duration is too short really - which is giving me grain problems.

http://www.pixspot.com/albums/userpics/normal_DSC_0099web.jpg
paulvdb1
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: NW Sydney

Postby waspo on Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:52 pm

Hi Dave, love the look of the moon through the clouds! :D
You prompted me to test out the Sigma@270mm, hoping to see some difference although it didn't look too disimilar to the shot I took with my Nikon 70-210mm awhile back. :)

Image
(Smartsharpened + USM)-Sigma 70-300mm@270 1/400@f/8 ISO400.

Paul, what were your settings used for your shot? It looks quite detailed! :shock:
Last edited by waspo on Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
waspo
Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Bentleigh East, Melbourne - SuPeR NikoN D7o aBuSeR!

Postby mudder on Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:51 pm

G'day Dave,
Cool moon shot, really like the atmosphere the clouds add... Might be worth a try with some added contrast on the moon itself? Prefer the first shot, more moody...

Jase, good shot mate... Clear and detailed...
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby paulvdb1 on Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:13 pm

waspo wrote:Paul, what were your settings used for your shot? It looks quite detailed! :shock:

F5.6 @ 1/100sec - 300mm. I'm still playing with the camera and trying to work out what works - I've only had a digital camera for 1 month so it's all new. I tried a few moon shots tonight but getting shakes on my tripod. Unfortunately the tripod's a fairly cheap video tripod so shorter than 1/50sec is fine - anything longer is just a blur.
paulvdb1
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 2:22 pm
Location: NW Sydney

Postby waspo on Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:40 pm

Thanks paul. I thought maybe you had it a little faster. I shot mine 1/400@f/8 ISO400. My tripod wobbles around abit too and I have to wait til it settles to trigger the remote. :lol:
Update: Just tried 1/40@f/32-too soft. Looks like the principle regarding focal length and speed still applies that being focal length at 300mm should equate to shutter speed 1/300 or more there abouts. Oh well, having fun learning.
Cheers, Jase. :)
User avatar
waspo
Member
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 8:46 pm
Location: Bentleigh East, Melbourne - SuPeR NikoN D7o aBuSeR!

Postby mic on Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:57 pm

Dave,

Love that 1st with the cloud as a natural filter.

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques