Not your text book flower shot

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Not your text book flower shot

Postby johndec on Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:01 am

Taken today in the Royal National Park south of Sydney. No macro, 200mm at 2.8:

Image
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby NetMagi on Wed Aug 03, 2005 1:19 am

Love the sharpness and clarity, but I think the background overwhelms the flower. Maybe a tighter crop would help.

I can't put my finger on it, but the background just doesn't complement the flower to me. I'm wondering if the flower fell lower in the bg, like under the arch in the trees if it would be framed better.

Anyway, don't mind me, I'm just rambling about things I know nothing about trying to reply on the topics where nobody else has bothered.

-Rich
D70, 18-70 DX, Sigma 70-300 APOII, Nikkor 50mm 1.4D, SB800, Bogen 3046 w/Manfrotto 322RC2 ballhead, Lowepro Nova 2 AW
User avatar
NetMagi
Member
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:45 am
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA, US

Postby owen on Wed Aug 03, 2005 8:13 am

I really like how the background colour contrasts with the red of the flower. I think it works perfectly. Even though the background is 'cluttered' it is all out of focus nicely so the attention isn't drawn away from the flower.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques