Mona Vale Beach - Sunrise ShootModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Mona Vale Beach - Sunrise ShootGidday,
These were taken at Mona Vale Beach on Sunday 31/7/05. Please give feedback, I'm still beginning and maybe half my issues are the Photoshop processing. Cheers Warwick[/list] Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
Thanks Rokkstar,
Should you always have a perfectly horizontal horizon for a good image? I can always try and skew the image in PS and make it straight. Cheers Warwick Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
Hi Wocka
Serenity plus. Great shots with beautiful colour. I would consider the rule of 3 for a couple of the shots. At least play with it when cropping. The rule is about looking at thirds of the photo eg two thirds land and one third sky. A couple of the shots are centred and while they are excellent in their overall composition they could be dramatised more by using this old rule. I would probably apply it with the first, fourth and fifth. Some of it can be done simply by cropping. Great work. Peter Mc Nikon & Olympus
Wocka...
i love the composition of the shots. Nothing wrong with slightly crooked horizons when it's balanced with strong linear foreground. I think it can add interest. How did you process them in PS? Fiona "I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then. Against the wind, I keep runnin' against the wind."
Well, I don't really know. I guess if it's intentional to make the horizon not straight then cool. If however, to me, it looks as if it's meant to be straight but isn't then I would correct it. Sometimes though it takes others to point it out. I took a shot the other day, thought the horizon was straight, and the police told me to straighten it. Would have completely slipped past me otherwise. Matt
Thanks Peter,
The first shot I actually cropped the other way 2/3 of sky and 1/3 land. I did this because I preferred the colour of the sky compared to the dark forground. I can change it easily enough. I have heard of the 2/3rd's rule before. Is it always 2/3rd's land that I should compose my images when shooting? I guess the sky isn't very intersting usually. Cheers Warwick Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
Hi Fiona,
I'm very new to this DSLR and PS stuff. Basically I changed the colours using the Image / Adjustments / Auto Level and Auto Contrast. I only did this cause, someone at work walked behind me and asked have I tried these 2 options. So I did, and liked the result. I think I sharpened a little using the auto sharpen tool. But I don't know when I'm going too far on these images. Time will tell. Cheers Warwick Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
Warwick
You have an eye for sublime colours and creamy smooth tones. Very nice images...looks as if they have had a touch of Pprocessing. I would like to see them as prints. Regards
Matt. K
Warwick. These are a great bunch. A little criticism first. I feel cheated that such great shots are so small here I can't see them in their true glory. I'd suggest a link to a large version also so we can see the detail better. This is particularly the cae for the first image where the detail is very hard to appreciate.
I think the colours in the second one are fantastically well contrasted. You have the orange of the sky blending into the rusty colours of the railing and the blue into the pool. They work in concert to really draw you into the scene and the leading lines round out the effect beautifully. Well composed and well processed. I also really like the fourth one for the strong use of leading lines. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Nikon & Olympus
Great shots Wock! I only just stumbled upon this post! Would love to see larger versions .
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Great shots Wocka, I particularly like the composition and colours of number 2. Very nice.
Cheers
Mark http://www.photographicaustralia.com http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Thanks for all the kind words guys.
Matt K: I'm definitely thinking of sending some of these off to be printed. Which leads me to a Q: Is there a tutorial for preparing images for print? I have done a quick search on the forum. All I know if that it needs to be 300dpi when sent. Geoff & Stubbsy: I'll upload larger images to pixspot and post the links. The panorama's are 15MB, So I'll cut them down a little. Stubbsy: The first / second image was helped by a nice orange flood light that keeps the pool illuminated. You can see it in the first picture. Jethro: No filters were used on the lens itself. And only Photoshop actions as stated before. Eg Auto levels and Auto Contrast. Stephen: Here is the EXIF data Picture 1: Exposure Time: 25s Exposure Time: 4.5 ISO: 100 ShutterSpeed: 15s Focal Length: 35mm Using: Exposure Program Picture 2: Exposure Time: 6s Exposure Time: 4 ISO: 100 ShutterSpeed: 4s Focal Length: 22mm Using: Exposure Program Picture 3: Exposure Time: 1/800s Exposure Time: 8 ISO: 400 ShutterSpeed: 0.001250s Focal Length: 41mm Using: Action Program Picture 4: Exposure Time: 1/500s Exposure Time: 5.6 ISO: 100 ShutterSpeed: 0.002000s Focal Length: 55mm Using: Exposure Program Picture 5: Exposure Time: 1/125s Exposure Time: 5.6 ISO: 100 ShutterSpeed: 0.008000s Focal Length: 18mm Using: Exposure Program Picture 6: Exposure Time: 1/13s Exposure Time: 13 ISO: 100 ShutterSpeed: 0.076923s Focal Length: 31mm Using: Exposure Program [/b] Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
Gidday,
Larger images can be found here. http://www.pixspot.com/thumbnails.php?album=597 Cheers Warwick. Warwick
======= Canon 40D : 350D Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
very good...... I like all these as sunrises have some great colours, If you have shot in RAW you should be able to get more from these with ACR, if not, try using some saturation in PS......
but you have set the bar rather high for yourself....... well done Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Previous topic • Next topic
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|