FlowersModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
FlowersThis is a subject I've never really photographed before so all critiques and feedback is welcome.
After looking over the images I just feel I'm missing something. I've seen some great flower images posted on this forum. Images with some 'zap' or 'mood' in them, so tips from these flower gurus are very welcome cheers, Craig
JordanP
The first 2 are fine images. The next 2 seem to be a bit weaker. I think with flowers you need to show the whole of the bloom, unless something special is happening. Regards
Matt. K
-->JordanP
I am not an expert in flowers (florist?;-), but: 1. With that I would prefer more close up and tighter composition. Propably white part could fill bottom of the frame leaving top in similar fasion. 2. Great. Maybe, but realy just maybe pattern of grean leaves behind could fill the frame more, especially on the right 3. No, not really. Something doesnt work here. 4. No 1. A bit confusing at first sight, but nicelly puts attension to complex petals pattern. Regards, K.Polak
#1 I like. I don't even mind the focal point being at the one thirds - which I'd usually object to. Chromatic abberation suggests it's either not taken with a macro lens and more likely a 70-300 of some flavour. It's a beautiful delicate flower, and well captured, but the CA spoils it for me.
#2 could do with a bit more contrast - it's somewhat flat looking. #3 cropped too tight for my liking. Main focal point - is it supposed to be the petal(s) or the bulb? #4 The fuzzies around the center aint in focus as I would have expected, it's a little strange IMO to have the sharpest point being the rearmost petals up against the bokeh.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|