LighthouseModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
LighthouseComments please on this one i took at the weekend north of Perth,Is the top left too plain,should i have tried to get some clouds up there?.
and this one?. One more
Stephen,
1: the top left is a bit plain, but it does tend to accentuate the height of the lighthouse. Maybe you could have got a bit closer to the lighthouse and angled the camera more upwards to get the feeling of height. Have you got a circular polarising filter? One of these would have given the sky a richer darker blue colour. The filter would also have enabled you to cut out some of the light reflecting off the left side of the lighthouse which might have given a more even exposure. Also, try cropping off the left hand half of the pic. There's no rule that says you have to use the whole pic. 2. this looks like you are using a polariser from the look of the sky. 3. a polariser would have helped with the sky in this one I reckon. D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Thanks John I dont have a polariser as yet but am on the hunt for one now .Would everyone recomend the hoya ones that birdy sells as a good purchase?.,Thanks for the comments ,i wiil keep your points in mind for next time
Stephen, I have polarisers for both my 50 f1.4 and my 18-70 kit lens. They are both Hoya. I bought the one for the 18-70 from Birdy and I think all his are Hoya.
The polariser is great for shots of water, waterfalls, sky and anything with a lot of reflected light. I'm doing a few waterfall shots, so I use the polariser alot. D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|