DSLRUsers.com
A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.
NudeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Nude
I attende a photo course at the QCA, Brisbane. 'Photographing the human form'................highly recommended. This pic is straight from the camera, absolutely no PP or filters used.
interesting stuff, was it expensive to go?
would might trying some stuff like that Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
geoff - fantastic - as far removed as can be from those terrible, smutty shots that seem to inhabit far to many 'camera club' walls.
Echo the question above - how did you do it, especially as this is straight from camera.... And finally -love the blue monochrome feel but i've really got a black and white bug at the moment - reckon your shot would look timeless in b+w in the beginning was the word, and the word was Aardvark......
Oh, that I were to look that good. 
That said, this image doesn't do it for me. Not as a nude, nor as a bodyscape. It seems too static, with no texture and little form. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Hi all
I would like to say that this photo was planned but unfotunately it was not, in fact to be perfectly honest it was a total fluke, a purely accidental result. It was produced on my Sony F717, manual mode, 1/30s f2.3, ISO320 focal length 28mm. The course was stuctured so that all students had 1/2 hour sessions with the model directing and shooting as desired. This photo was taken 'over the shoulder'of a fellow student while taking there turn at direction. I framed the shot and pressed the shutter release at exactly the same time as the studio lights were triggered by the other student and therefore this over exposed image resulted. I mentioned in another reply to redline that the course cost $70, great value except it ended up costing me nearly $3000! I had been contemplating upgrading to a DSLR and attending the course highlighted a few limitations of the Sony. The following week I invested in my D70s with standard kit lens and a 70-300 f5.6 ED, now considering a 60mm f2.8 macro to add to the collection and satisfy my lens lust. Geoff
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
- Mods Database • The team • Delete all board cookies • Reset blocks • All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]
