Page 1 of 1
Macros From the Garden
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:52 pm
by Slider
Firstly, thanks to Paul (aka NikonUser) for sharing his framing method upon which I have based this one.
This Grevillea is the first one we planted after moving in back in 1988.
Gnarly old tree but still produces great flowers.
Tamron 70-300mm Macro @ 240mm with 20mm extension tube (on tripod). 1/32s @f/5 Remote fill in flash hand held off to the side and diffused (with plastic shopping bag).
70-300mm Macro @ 200mm with 20mm extension tube (on tripod). 1/512s @ f/16 Remote flash diffused (through plastic shopping bag) hand held to the side.
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 3:56 pm
by sirhc55
Mark - both shots are excellent, #1 should be hung on your wall. The Tamron is certainly showing its optic quality along with your own skills.
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:09 pm
by Alpha_7
WOW!
They are gorgeous photo's, very well done I love them both.
Love the water droplets on the first, and love the detail in the second especially the "furry" bits for want of a better term.
Great shots!
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:36 pm
by JordanP
Sensational shots. I also particularly like the first one. I'd be framing and hanging that one if I shot it.
Very nice
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:46 pm
by OzzieGirl
Stunning photos. I like how the first one is focused on the ends of the flower and the water droplets add a beautiful effect to the shot.
#2 is so clear and sharp, well done.
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:49 pm
by stubbsy
Mark
Two great shots of a lovely Australian native. Thanks for sharing. (I have a tiny preference for the second shot as the bokeh on the first is a teensy weensy bit harsh for me)
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:51 pm
by Alpha_7
stubbsy wrote:Mark
Two great shots of a lovely Australian native. Thanks for sharing. (I have a tiny preference for the second shot as the bokeh on the first is a teensy weensy bit harsh for me)
Stubbsy, for the uninitiated, what is this bokeh you are refering too ?
I've seen it used once or twice and am not familar with the term.
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:03 pm
by mitedo
Great shots Mark
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:31 pm
by waspo
Wow, I love these shots especially the 1st one! Great use of the flash to achieve the lighting effect on the droplets.
Well done, mate!
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:20 pm
by christiand
wow,
those shots are "wunderbar"
CD
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:21 pm
by Poon
Beautiful.
Can not imagine the lens is so nice.
-------
Rgds
Poon
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 10:57 pm
by Slider
Thanks for all the great comments folks. I was very happy with the way they turned out. Forgot to add that I also used remote for shutter release to try and minimise unwanted movement. Just out of interest the 1st shot is almost full frame and the 2nd is about a 3/4 crop. I'm pretty impressed with this Tamron lens.
Alpha_7 wrote:stubbsy wrote:Mark
Two great shots of a lovely Australian native. Thanks for sharing. (I have a tiny preference for the second shot as the bokeh on the first is a teensy weensy bit harsh for me)
Stubbsy, for the uninitiated, what is this
bokeh you are refering too ?
I've seen it used once or twice and am not familar with the term.
I was going to ask the same question
Posted:
Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:14 pm
by Alpha_7
Glad I'm not the only one
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:11 am
by marc
Stubbsy, for the uninitiated, what is this bokeh you are refering too ?
"Bokeh" is the term used for a lens ability to render out of focus background
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:17 am
by Alpha_7
Thanks,
while I'm asking , I figured OOF is Out of Focus, but what is DOF ?
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:11 am
by KerryPierce
Very nice macro shots, Mark. That first one is quite striking with the highlights in the water drops.
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:23 am
by Rick
Alpha-7
DOF = depth of field, the amount of the picture that is in focus.
I know that from film days, but grumpy old men like me need a dictionary of digital abreviations and meanings.
Cheers, Rick
PS nice shots of the flowers.
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:33 pm
by paulvdb1
I definitely like the first shot more than second. #2's a great shot but #1 is really unusual, having just the tips of the flower and the drops in focus - very interesting.
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 4:38 pm
by Geoff
Sensational - sell shot #1 - it is worthy!
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:17 pm
by robboh
Slider. These are awesome.
I do agree with Stubbsy about the bokeh in the first one, though I honestly didnt notice it much in the first viewing. Is is possibly something that you can tune out a little in PP??
2nd shot
Posted:
Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:54 pm
by vrboy
The second shot is unreallll!!!!
it almost has a metallic feel to the reds, I love it.
C
Posted:
Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:33 pm
by Slider
Thanks again for the great feedback folks.
Here is a slightly altered version with the background blurred to reduce the impact of the lens bokeh.
Not sure. I think I am still leaning towards the original.
And I am reliably informed by the Boss that it is a Grevillea Banksii for those who may be interested.
Posted:
Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:49 am
by sirhc55
Mark - you are right the first image is certainly better with the bokeh as is