PrayerModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
PrayerSome more pics from Ullambana Day last Sunday (refer this thread for some more pics)
These images all focus on prayer. Click a pic for a larger version. The complete gallery can be found here. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
bump
30 views - no comments. Are the shots so bad, you hesitate to say, or so fantastic they leave you silent in awe? I suspect the former Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Shot 1 and 3 are my favourite, you get a strong feeling of the reverence of those praying (speeling).
Shot 2, something about the sea of brown chairs, I just don't like. Shot 4, I found the blown highlight on the left detracts from the shot.
Peter, hope you don't take this the wrong way (even so, you can bash me later), all your shots from the monastery seem to adhere to a 'formula' - they're mostly with you standing in the subject's 2 o'clock or 10 o'clock. All the shots are with the same lens, similar framing and distance to subject... They are superb shots (you can give credit to the fine glass or the object behind the viewfinder), but having them presented like that all at once, I find viewing the images kinda 'fatiguing', I don't know how to explain it properly...
Mix it up a bit. If you're choosing to stick with the 1 lens, vary your shooting angle and distance to subject (it seems you're neglecting the zoom with your 50). You know and have mastered the 50 shot with large aperture in daylight with or without fill flash - try something new! Experiment. Deliberately shoot mistakes - ie. use f/16 for a portrait. Throw out the rule books!!!
Chi I certainly don't take this the wrong way. Comments like these are where the value lies in posting here. It's necessary to hear both the good and the bad about your work in order to grow and develop. Thanks for the comments. I'd not really thought about what you say, but you are right. In many ways the 10 o'clock, 2 o'clock is a function of the shooting opportunites (I was down the left or right side of the hall), but I was also a little uncomfortable early on being in people's faces by standing in front of them since I'm not usually doing portrait pics (good to step out of my comfort zone). I have some with the 24-120 and 70-200, but again these are also largely from the same angle. I also have a number taken in the grounds that are very different as well as a whole stack of 24-120 shots of people performing at the concert that afternoon. Both groups are very different to these and I'll be posting these tonight or tomorrow. Below is one of the Master Venerable when I plucked up the courage to stand in front of him (although looking at it now, I think I might go back and do a tighter crop to remove the monks either side). Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Peter. #3 for me, the face of the main subject is interesting, the colours and the repetition of the main subject in the OOF areas are what do it for me.
I also liked the cropped Master Venerable, its the riot of colour with the intricate detail, then in the middle of all this is an old calm wise face. Smile; it makes people wonder what you have been up to.
Nice shots there Stubbsy,
Very relaxing, I might go off and take a bath & have a Prayer I won't attack one of these images on you like your last lot. Mic.
...... you have taken away the story........the first post told me a lot, well the cropped verson, although good, does not have as much interest..... Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Thanks for the comments guys. #1 & #3 are my faves, plus the Master Venerable (wanted more pics of him but didn't have the courage). These people exude calmness - it's amazing to experience.
BP - I agree cropped version has less impact. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|