Page 1 of 1

Is it really that big?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:39 pm
by -=Monty=-
Well, i was experimenting with my 70-300mm and the 50mm backwards, and i came up with a few shots.

And, wow, is it hard focusing. I had to use duct tape and manual focus, coz auto wouldn't work.

I also had to have the camera a certain distance from the item, otherwise it wouldnt work.

But anyway, here is what i came up with. I'm still not happy with the colours on some, i will have to do some pp. But i just thought i would quickly post them before i start my homework :P

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Re: Is it really that big?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:44 pm
by wendellt
Dude

that is insane!!

what kind of converter ring were you using?

are you really 14?

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:46 pm
by -=Monty=-
I kinda feel real ghetto saying this, but i didn't use a converter ring. I just used duct tape to keep it all together.

And i'm really 14, i turned 14 31st of may.

Now, onto homework. :cry: :cry:

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:54 pm
by wendellt
-=Monty=- wrote:I kinda feel real ghetto saying this, but i didn't use a converter ring. I just used duct tape to keep it all together.

And i'm really 14, i turned 14 31st of may.

Now, onto homework. :cry: :cry:


Your a real prodigy mate!

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:56 pm
by marcos
Amazing Monty, I did some experimentation also with the combination of the 70-300mm and the 60mm micro reversed too, and yes it is hard to focus, see my samples of a small coin on a recent post here, plus almost no dof, I love those shots, what is the last pic?

14? damn! can't even remember when was 14,
keep on shooting Monty!

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:58 pm
by embi
What a legend.... A 14yr old and a roll of duct tape.....

Keep up the great work....


....Now where is that duct tape

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:58 pm
by marcos
Monty, I forgot to mention that you said that you didn't like the color, but when you get that close you block the lighting falling into it, give it a longer exposure, you'll get a little less noise too.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:18 pm
by -=Monty=-
Just to let you guys know, I took most of these photos in my bathroom. :D This is because the heat lights were awefully bright, and they gave me pretty constant light.

The 3rd pic is of a little 4mm wide ripcurl logo on my watch.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:25 pm
by sirhc55
Monty - without being patronising, I can see a great future for you in photography and these shots are just the beginning :D

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:34 pm
by robboh
These are kewl.
I was playing with long exposure like this for the 'decisive moment' comp on a clock, but you've gotten much better results.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:42 pm
by mic
Monty,

Time is catching up with you :roll: Great shots !
But watch out you don't run out of time, you were only 12 a couple of months back :shock:

Have you discovered some sort of time machine ma boy :lol: :lol:

Mic. :wink:
We might call you the DOC :roll:

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:52 pm
by Jamie
Great pictures.........well done. :)

Jamie

PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:58 pm
by Willy wombat
Very cool. If you have another camera and dont feel it will give away your secrets, - take a picture of the set up. Im interested to see it.

Love it

WW

PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:03 am
by Atorie
Mate, all I can say is excellent work, I'm really impressed by your initiative!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:07 am
by Alpha_7
Willy wombat wrote:Very cool. If you have another camera and dont feel it will give away your secrets, - take a picture of the set up. Im interested to see it.

Love it

WW


Or if you don't have another camera, you could use your duct tape and an elaborate set of mirrors to show your setup.

(My wife was amazed when she saw the shots, but she did ask, is it your camera ? Or your families ?)

PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:28 am
by MattC
Monty,

These shots are great. I particularly like the second. This is inspirational stuff. I even had a go... Not that I came up with anything as spectacular!



Willy, here is a shot of my setup sans body. The 50/1.8 is reverse mounted to the 70-300G (which is mounted to the camera body). I substituted the gaffa for some (6 for $1) electrical tape. On the 50/1.8 I opened the aperture up to 1.8 and focus was set to infinity. I might have a go with different focus settings on the 50mm (dont do this with lens attached - it tries to extend into the 70-300 front element) when I get over the headache this exercise gave me!
I had the benefit of an SB800 so I set it up of to the side in SU-4 mode.
This setup gave about 1000 pixels per mm - a pin head from the GF's sewing kit was about 1200 pixels across.

Cheers


Image

PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:23 am
by stubbsy
Monty

You can be justifiably proud of what you've achieved and for your sake I'm glad there's a place like this where people can appreciate and encourage your efforts since I'm guessing your school friends don't "get" it. :wink:

Keep up the work, but do the homework too (gee I sound like my dad :shock: )

PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 5:59 pm
by -=Monty=-
Alpha_7 wrote:(My wife was amazed when she saw the shots, but she did ask, is it your camera ? Or your families ?)


No, it is my camera, with my 70-300mm lens, but the 50mm is my dad's, that he got for a present.

He is still using a nikon f50 and my old f65.

stubbsy wrote:.... since I'm guessing your school friends don't "get" it. :wink:


This is very true. I have one friend that is kinda interested. but he isn't greatly.


But thanks everyone for all your comments. I still have about 500 shots that i have to work through, and i will post the best when i find time.