Crane shot with 80-200

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Crane shot with 80-200

Postby johnd on Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:19 pm

I am looking for a used Nikkor 80-200 2.8. I found one of the older push pull variety for sale and took it for a test drive.

This is one of the shots taken at f7.1, 200mm, hand held, can't remember shutter speed but it's bright sunlight so it's probably about 1/1000. It looks pretty sharp to me.

Can anyone see anything obvious that might indicate that the lens might have had a hard life.

Image


Comments much appreciated.
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby BBJ on Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:51 pm

Except for the sky colour John looks ok to me sharp enough, i guess if it looks ok and is on good nick at a good price it is ok. Depending on price though.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby johndec on Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:52 pm

Bit hard to tell from that pic, but it looks OK. As far as its' condition, besides looking for the obvious signs of wear and tear, scratches,etc, hold the lens vertical and if the zoom ring stays still, it's probably a keeper, if the zoom ring slides down the body, it's seen a lot of work... :shock: BTW, how much do they want for it and does it come with the hood and case?
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby birddog114 on Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:55 pm

johndec wrote:Bit hard to tell from that pic, but it looks OK. As far as its' condition, besides looking for the obvious signs of wear and tear, scratches,etc, hold the lens vertical and if the zoom ring stays still, it's probably a keeper, if the zoom ring slides down the body, it's seen a lot of work... :shock:


Exactly right! It's how to check the push & pull zoom lens.

BTW, how much do they want for it and does it come with the hood and case?


Hehehe! I can see you're in the lust now :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby johndec on Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:08 pm

Birddog114 wrote:
Hehehe! I can see you're in the lust now :wink:


How many 80-200s do you think I need :?: :shock: :shock:
If I'm alone in a forest and my wife is not around to hear what I say, am I still wrong ??
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby birddog114 on Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:09 pm

johndec wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:
Hehehe! I can see you're in the lust now :wink:


How many 80-200s do you think I need :?: :shock: :shock:


Perhaps two: one to mount on the D70 and other reverse :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby johnd on Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:54 am

johndec wrote:Bit hard to tell from that pic, but it looks OK. As far as its' condition, besides looking for the obvious signs of wear and tear, scratches,etc, hold the lens vertical and if the zoom ring stays still, it's probably a keeper, if the zoom ring slides down the body, it's seen a lot of work... :shock: BTW, how much do they want for it and does it come with the hood and case?


$500, but he wants to move it with a 35-70 f2.8 for $650 total, so me and a guy I work with who's also on this forum (O1) offered $500 for the 80-200 and $150 for the 35-70. I took some test shots last night and the 35-70 is as soft as anything and it should also be sharp so there's something wrong with it, so I think the deal is going to fall thru. And yes, the 80-200 has a hood and case.

On the 80-200, the UV filter is screwed on crooked. It's obviously been cross threaded so either the filter or lens thread is stuffed. When you focus the 80-200 with the d70, it made a clunking noise which I didn't like. It's been treated fairly rough as well by the looks of the nicks and marks on it. Focus is slow of course being the old type of lens that uses that screwdiver thingy to focus from the camera. I'm going to be in Melbourne tomorrow so will check out Camera Exchange to see what they've got. Talking to O1 who has the 80-200 with the zoom ring rather than push pull, he reckons once I try the zoom ring type of 80-200 I won't want to touch the push pull one. I really prefer the one with the lens collar as well, so I reckon I'll be saving my $$$s and giving Birdy a call.

The more I think about it the more I've convinced myself that I won't be buying this particular 80-200 because I think it's had a hard life. So johndec, if you wanted to go for it, it's in the Trading Post in Hobart.

Thanks for your help and advice on this guys.
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby birddog114 on Thu Aug 25, 2005 12:02 pm

For Johndec,
It's good for you to seek another 80-200, using reverse or stacking it up to 400mm :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

used Nikkor 80-200

Postby Cool Cursor on Thu Aug 25, 2005 12:16 pm

Check for oil on aperture veins if they look even slightly wet will indicate damper seal is leaking -fatal
good luck
CC
Cool Cursor
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Adelaide (Nailsworth)


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques