Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.
Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.
Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.
Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by MHD on Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:19 am
Taken in the botanic gardens on that glorious day we had yesterday!!!
Mounted on tripod, using SB-80DX + LS II, d70 + 105/2.8 Micro-nikkor
The aim was to get the halo effect from the backlighting but not have the faces over blown... So I spot metered on the halo, added a little comp, then used the flash to bring up the faces...
White balance was achieved by holding a white card next to Louise's face in a previous shot and using the RGB values from that to compensate
http://images.potofgrass.com/host/family1193
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by MHD on Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:20 am
My critique: I should have had less stuff in the background...
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by Alex on Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:26 am
Very nice, MHD. I would only crop out the wheel of a (pram?) on the right.
Alex
-

Alex
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
- Location: Melbourne - Nikon
-
by MHD on Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:11 am
Yep... a pram..
Will give it a go...
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by moggy on Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:11 am
Great looking sandwich! He he, nice family group and would agree with Alex, the pram wheels needs to go. Well done.

-

moggy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s
by MHD on Mon Aug 29, 2005 12:56 pm
mmmm cream cheese and smoked salmon 
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by stubbsy on Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:05 pm
Scott
Beautifully lit, but finish eating the sanga next time  . I think this is a great starting point for a series of shots. Louise looks great, but you look a little strange lounging in from the side (like you jumped down there after setting up the camera, rather than you were reclining there as part of the image). Perhaps you could be propping your head up with your hand - I think it's the loose arm that looks unnatural. You're on to a good thing with this approach so go back and have another go after being super analytical of the shot yourself. I'd really like to see the result of this since what you've achieved here is way in front of that boring studio portrait stuff.
-

stubbsy
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
- Location: Newcastle NSW - D700
-
by leek on Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:22 pm
Well lit Scott... A nice informal portrait...
I'm not sure what was behind you, but it may have looked better from a lower viewpoint with an out of focus background...
Declutter and try again...
Can I suggest a brightly coloured toy that is perched on top of the camera so that you draw the baby's eyes to the lens too... Difficult to guarantee, but this might increase the chances of eye contact...
-

leek
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3135
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Lane Cove, Sydney
-
by MHD on Mon Aug 29, 2005 4:12 pm
Excellent suggestions!
Yep... it looks like I just jumped into the shot because I did... perhaps time to pull out the remote again!
It was one of those experimental things and I will definately try again 
-

MHD
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
- Location: Chicago Burbs
-
by petermmc on Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:04 pm
I think its a great fun family shot warts and all...having had twins you need a half eaten sandwhich and a pram to make it authentic. Notice everyone is looking at a different point...that's how it is. Beaut lighting.
Peter Mc
Nikon & Olympus
-

petermmc
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:24 pm
- Location: Figtree, Wollongong
Return to Image Reviews and Critiques
|