Star trails @ Castle Rock

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Star trails @ Castle Rock

Postby DaveB on Thu Sep 01, 2005 2:59 pm

Please excuse me for two image posts in quick succession. I couldn't see anything in the forum rules about posting limits like we see on some other forums.

Image
EOS 20D, 17-40mm@17mm

This is 4.5 hours of trails, looking directly south (obviously!). I'll give exposure details later if you're interested (anyone care to guess?).

I must say that keeping the trails from going jagged at this size is pretty tricky...
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby leek on Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:24 pm

That's a great photo... Feel free to link to a slightly larger one if you're having trouble with jagged lines...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby MHD on Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:29 pm

Yikes.... well the stars have done a 1/4 turn so my guess would be 6 hours...
but it looks so clean..

Must have been dark there for the landscape to be so well exposed and not blown...

looks sureal..!
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby darb on Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:01 pm

if thast one frame, then its a true testament to one of the canon prosumer market strengths.

A d70 would require you do short length frames, and stack them later with stacking software. (even then, CCD amp oerheating would create a pink tinge and noise, meaning you have to run the NR job, which then creates a time delay and possibly adds gaps in the stars ... either that or you do it in say 10 second segments (still with NR, because if youre doing a bunch of 10 second shots in a row, the CCD amp will still heat up) ... meanign you'll end up with hundreds of thousands or images to go and stack ... a nightmare.

(all this from a very happy d70 owner) :)
http://davidsonimagery.com/
Right place, right time, where the hecks my camera ...
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby Oneputt on Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:26 pm

Great shot absolutely love it. My guess is 4.5hrs :wink: Wouldn't have a clue though about apeture.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby daniel_r on Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm

Darb,

My thoughts exactly - damn!

I've attempted similar shots like this and realistically you dont have any choice but to run NR... and waiting for the NR job can be a tedious process :cry:

DaveB - well done, great capture.
For this type of shot to work well, a lot comes into play such as a no breeze, low levels of ambient light in the foreground, a stable tripod and not having your front element dew up in the cold.

D.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby darb on Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:40 pm

http://darb.net/ny04?page=2

some images on this page are night shots star trails ... single frames ... but with NR running, so i couldnt stack them (mind you i was half pissed) some are around the 20 minute mark.

It will be lovely when nikons d70 replacement / prosumer market moves to a cleaner / non over-heating sensor. (and its just aswell every other aspect of the d70 kicks butt ! :) )
http://davidsonimagery.com/
Right place, right time, where the hecks my camera ...
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby darb on Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:46 pm

out of curiousity, how did you know where to shoot in order to get a perfect axis of the stars. Just facing north?
http://davidsonimagery.com/
Right place, right time, where the hecks my camera ...
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby lejazzcat on Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:33 pm

I agree mate- Very nice !
Im very impressed with the canon - i regret to say :evil: .
So many ideas. So little time.

"The camera is much more than a recording apparatus, it is a medium via which messages reach us from another world, a world that is not ours and that brings us to the heart of a great secret" Orson Welles
User avatar
lejazzcat
Member
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 9:37 am
Location: Sydney Australia D70

Postby Killakoala on Thu Sep 01, 2005 6:37 pm

Great image. Looks sweetly executed and shows heaps of patience. Great colours in the stars.

My guess is about a 2 hour exposure and a photoshop job with the foreground layer. It could be my eyes but some of the star trails look as if they are slightly on 'this side' of the ridge. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby DaveB on Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:01 pm

No it's not one single exposure. 68 frames in fact.
The 20D can handle quite long exposures, but I wasn't sure how far I should push it. So I settled on 4-minute exposures at ISO200 (camera's base is 100) and the lens stopped down slightly to f/5.6. The Canon timer remote allowed me to take consecutive 4-minute shots (although the shortest interval between shots I could get was 1 second).

The resulting shots were stacked to produce the trails. I used ImageMagick with a Brighten compose operator that I added (I have a background in software development) to do this: if you had a Windows machine you could use Max Lyon's ImageStacker. It wasn't tedious (the RAW->TIFF conversion was batched, and then the stacking ran unattended) but it did take my laptop a while to grind through it all. I then brought this into Photoshop & cleaned up the few hot pixels scattered around the image. I shot without extra NR as the 20D (unlike the 10D and 5D) would do this with another 4-minute dark-frame exposure, making for very dashed lines.
This method of shooting star trails is not without its drawbacks however. 4 minutes equals 1 degree of rotation, and 1 second is 1/4 of a minute of arc. You end up with dashed lines (especially toward the edges of the frame) and although the gaps are very small, resizing algorithms preserve this as "important" detail. Max and I have compared notes, and the best solution I've come up with so far is to take a copy of the sky, rotate it very slightly (pivoting around the pole which is easy to identify) and blend it back in.

The foreground is actually another frame taken earlier in the evening. The whole thing is still an experiment: I'm toying with different white balances on the underlying shots, and using a different stacking mode for the foreground so I can use the actual night-time image there. Unfortunately it was a new moon so there was only starlight to work with.

darb wrote:out of curiousity, how did you know where to shoot in order to get a perfect axis of the stars. Just facing north?
North? South. It's easy to work out where due South is, and if you have a map or a GPS you'll know your latitude in degrees. That many degrees above the horizon is where the pole will be.
Work out while it's still light where the camera needs to be, and set up the tripod/etc. Then go back to camp (your cameras need to be far enough away so your camp lights, campfire smoke, etc don't cause problems). A couple of hours after sunset come out and start the cameras going (and find your way back to camp in the dark without getting lights in your shot). Then get up several hours before dawn and go out to turn the cameras off (unless the battery's run out in the night like it did with this image). I was doing this with several other people, and everyone else was using film. Funnily enough they were a bit more careful than I needed to be with not getting torchlight in their shots at the start/end of their single exposure...
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Willy wombat on Thu Sep 01, 2005 11:47 pm

Thanks for sharing this technique with us. What an excellent result you have achieved. Congrats on a sweet pic.
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby KerryPierce on Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:35 am

Excellent shot, Dave. Very well done! :D
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
User avatar
KerryPierce
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1233
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:20 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby marcotrov on Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:07 am

Chamber's Pillar, Castle rock what a great location. Great image too, Dave! I'm always too scared to leave my camera out at night for such long periods. My luck a bat or night jarl would crap on it or nock it down.
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby DaveB on Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:56 am

Thanks for the positive feedback folks!
marcotrov wrote:I'm always too scared to leave my camera out at night for such long periods. My luck a bat or night jarl would crap on it or nock it down.

I wouldn't be afraid of bats/nightjars: they're not going to fly into it in the dark! The concerns are mainly:
  • Dew. This wasn't a problem on this trip but it's not unusual to use a shower cap on your camera.
  • Dew on the lens can be dealt with by a small fan on a second tripod blowing across the front element. Depends on whether the conditions warrant it (it didn't on this trip).
  • Dingoes. I know of one person who left their hat on the camera overnight instead of a clean plastic bag/showercap: because they'd been wearing it all day it obviously smelt interesting enough that dingoes knocked the tripod over and stole the hat (the other tripods near it were untouched). For similar reasons you need to bring your boots inside your tent/swag overnight!
  • People. Obviously a nice camera on a nice tripod out in the middle of nowhere could be a tempting target for a thief. Out back there aren't as many people as closer to town, and in general they're not low-life. But why tempt fate: set your gear up well off the beaten track.
Lastly you could knock your own gear over! Finding your gear in the dark can be tricky (especially when there's no moonlight and you don't want to use a torch to avoid spoiling the shots - I have a trail of someone's headtorch in one of my shots from another evening) and people take different approaches:
  • You can memorise your path from the camera back to the nearest trail (where you can then use a shaded torch) and leave a subtle marker at the turnoff.
  • I know of one person who leaves a flashing red light (the taillight off a bike) on a foot of their tripod pointing backwards. But this would seem to invite visitors, so I don't advise this.
  • I use my GPS, marking the locations (in daylight) of my tripod along with those of the other people I'm working with on the night. Then I don't have to leave any markers, and can find them from any direction.
One night on this trip we had a conga line heading out across a plain with me and my GPS in front, dropping people off at their tripods as we went...
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Greg B on Fri Sep 02, 2005 10:51 am

Great shot and very interesting details Dave. Thanks for sharing that detailed information.

We don't have posting limits here at this stage, it hasn't been necessary.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques