Rock pool - Thredbo

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Rock pool - Thredbo

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:48 pm

A few slow shutter shots from Thredbo. I can barely lift my arms after hitting the slopes. I would pay $1000 for a new arse right now too.

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{7F926B10-A92E-4EC3-9484-C396C9B06AFC}/picture.JPG[/img]


[img]http://www.fototime.com/{68AD5E2C-08B7-4962-B144-368375D64B1A}/picture.JPG[/img]

Cheers
WW
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Sep 04, 2005 9:58 pm

WW.

Sorry I can't help you out with a new arse, but I do really like these shots. :)
Do you have any more to add ?
Did you try any different angles ? I think this could of benefited from a lower perspective.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:26 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:WW.

Sorry I can't help you out with a new arse, but I do really like these shots. :)
Do you have any more to add ?
Did you try any different angles ? I think this could of benefited from a lower perspective.


Glad you like them Alpha. They look a little better when viewed at high res.

Will add a couple more from this shoot tomorrow. :)
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby leek on Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:32 pm

Nice shots WW... Prefer the 2nd one as the moss on the rocks comes out more... You might want to try boosting the saturation to highlight the green even more...

Just one question for my own benefit... Why was your ISO set to 400 on a long exposure???
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:52 pm

Leek - seemed like a good idea at the time?

Actually I was shooting in low light before hand and didnt change it back. For my own interest - what negatives will shooting at elevated ISO have on a long exposure?
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby Alex on Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:54 pm

Hi WW, very nice results. I really like these shots. Did you use any filter? What shutter speeds?

Thanks
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby Alex on Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:57 pm

Alex wrote:Hi WW, very nice results. I really like these shots. Did you use any filter? What shutter speeds?

Thanks
Alex


Oops. Did not notice you had exif printed in. Thanks
Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby leek on Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:05 pm

Willy wombat wrote:Leek - seemed like a good idea at the time?

Actually I was shooting in low light before hand and didnt change it back. For my own interest - what negatives will shooting at elevated ISO have on a long exposure?


The only negative I could think of would be that your shutter speed would be half what it could have been...
Normally when going for a long exposure like that, you'd keep the ISO as low as poss to get the longest possible exposure...

I just thought there was something I was missing... 200 --> 400 ISO isn't that big a deal anyway...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Willy wombat on Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:22 pm

leek wrote:You might want to try boosting the saturation to highlight the green even more...


I pushed the saturation. Works good!

[img]http://www.fototime.com/{A392412D-B3FE-4C43-95C8-E865D2511870}/picture.JPG[/img]
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/
My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto
Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
User avatar
Willy wombat
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Bentleigh, VIC Australia

Postby leek on Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:32 pm

Oh Yeah... I like it...

Next step would be to selectively apply higher saturation...
The green tinge to the water doesn't look right, but it has brought out the green of the moss on the rocks...

Sorry - I'm probably asking you to do things that I couldn't do... :-)
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques