Tamron macros and SB600 flashModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tamron macros and SB600 flashG'day all in D70 land.
Been away for a while (again) and unable to spend any time on D70. Life gets too busy! Anyway, took a few macros yesterday with Tamron 300mm lens in macro mode and manual focus, used tripod and my new SB600 lens in my left hand, using the D70 in commander mode. Here are a few results after a little bit of postprocessing: Any comments welcomed! Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Ok Max, what can't you do with your Tamron? I am sure I haven't seen a wide angle or fisheye shot from it
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
That first one looks like a 3D model Love the 2nd pic, nice and bright
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
First one is stunning! How about removing the shadow and changing the background to black? Killer!
regards
Mike Parker Frederick, MD Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints
Hi Max
you have posted some very nice photos here....well done. My comments for each are: #1 I really like the graphical illustration look about this shot. My only critisism is that the shadow seems to play with your eyes and takes some attention away from the petals of the flower. Perhaps the shadow could be faded/muted so it doesn't stand out as much, but is still evident to portray the 3D look ?!? #2 A beautiful, crisp photo which stands out well from the nicely OOF background. Great use of DOF in this one. The darker background areas really help to lift the brighter petals towards the viewer. Again, my critisism is the blown highlights at the ends of the petals. More definition by exposing them for less time, I feel, would make this image even stronger. #3 This is a really nice photo and I like the exposure on this one, though the DOF could have been a touch shallower, to blur the background (just my preference). The flower in the top left is partially cut out of the frame. This image would have looked stronger if the entire frame was moved to the left to include the whole "top left" flower, and remove some of the space from the right side of the orange flower....IMO. #4 The OOF flowers in the centre of this image detract from this too much, for my liking. It also looks too busy. The Lorikeet seems to get lost in all the fine detail of the multitude of smaller flowers. Perhaps a crop around the Lorikeet, leaving some of the flowers to border the image may work well here (although I guess it depends on what YOU are trying to achieve with this photo). The bird could be the secondary point of interest in this image (the flowers being the main point of interest), in which case, my suggestion would lose it's merit. Please read this as constructive critisism Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Thanks all for the comments, will definitely have a go at some of the suggestions, thanks Dave for your detailed analysis. Funny thing Poon, everyone likes the 2nd one it seems but I don't!?
Anyway, it's all lots of fun. I will try a black background for #1, although it seems everyone uses black these days. I must correct re the last photo. In hindsight, I realise that this one was not taken with the Tamron but with the kit lens and Sb600 attached to the camera in manual mode. Funny thing is, this one has already been given yesterday to a local newspaper who want to use it in some advertising for the local botanic gardens!? I wish I had more time to get back into D70 land, oh well, that's life! Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
All are nice shots, Max, but #3 is the one that gets my eye.
my gallery of so-so photos
http://www.pbase.com/kerrypierce/
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|