Two kooks up a treeModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Two kooks up a treeSaw these two fellas earlier today, both laughing their heads off (laughing at me I think, never saw a bloke so ugly...)
Second one not quite sharp enough but then again, it's only a Tamron... Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Prefer number 1 over number 2, as you said number two isn't as sharp.
I find the sunflare ? or whatever it is in the bottom right a little distracting in pic 1, however I like the bokeh of this shot. (trying to use a new word correctly, please let me know if I am mis using it). Would of loved a shot with their beaks open mid laugh, rather then smirking at you as they are here.
Yeah , the flare needs to be cloned out but I couldn't be bothered! As for a better shot, I was looking almost straight up at the birds so I couldn't get any closer for a better shot.
Max President, A.A.A.A.A (Australian Association Against Acronym Abuse)
Canon EOS R6, RF 24-105 F4, RF 70-200 F4, RF 35mm F1.8, RF 16mm F2.8 "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)
Hi Max, good catch with the 2 close together like that.
I think both suffer from being under flashed. With the first one the background is blown but thats what is going to happen shooting into the sun. Because you werent able to move the birds to a better perch I think it would have looked better exposing for the strong background light and having your flash providing the main light for this shot. Birds can be frustrating things to photograph!! Steve
Previous topic • Next topic
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|