Three Studies in Tone

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Three Studies in Tone

Postby stubbsy on Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:15 pm

Playing around with a few shots taken at the weekend. These are all an experiment in focusing on the tonings of the image rather than their colour. I'd be interested if they work (or don't work) for you. Click a pic for a larger version.

Image

Image

Image
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Glen on Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:30 pm

Stubbsy, it is amazing how the grain lends a certain feel to an image. Looked at full size, I could easily believe that the first was taken 40 or 50 years ago. I like the effect. (Also was amazed you got 50 people to line up like that :wink: )
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Aussie Dave on Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:30 pm

Hi Stubbsy
good to see you experimenting. I generally don't convert many pics into B&W, although I probably should try to do it more often, as your photos look very nice indeed.

The 2nd pic could perhaps do with a little more contrast (going by my work LCD monitor) and the 1st seems to have quite a few blown highlights (which distract the eye a bit)...but the compositions are all very good.

Good stuff :)
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby stubbsy on Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:41 pm

Glen
The people were all lined up because the centre of the bridge had been rotated and the crossing closed. When they opened the bridge I ran forward in front of the people on my side so I could get a shot with a wall of people coming at me. Here's a pic of the bridge open (not happy with the shot so I haven't done much PP on it).

Image

Dave
The first shot has a lot of blown highlights as part of the processing since I was trying to bring up the people. I left it that way because it somehow gave an old style photo effect to it (like Glen has mentioned). The second pic was a similar challenge since every time I tried to increase contrast I blew the highlights big time on the roof at the right so I left it as is.

Thank you both for your comments.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Glen on Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:09 pm

Thanks for sharing the trick :wink:
http://wolfeyes.com.au Tactical Torches - Tactical Flashlights Police torch rechargeable torch military torch police military HID surefire flashlight LED torch tactical torch rechargeable wolf eyes flashlight surefire torch wolf eyes tactical torchpolice torch
Thank You
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby nito on Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:40 pm

hey stubbsy, I like the first shot. Decent density if people and well framed. Gives off the busy impression very well.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques