Keeping flora on the agenda (5 images)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Keeping flora on the agenda (5 images)Few recent images. Personally I liked them due to simplicity, simplicity and simplicity. Minimal post work. Any comments and impresions are welcome
Regards, K.Polak
Very nice. Really like the simplicity of the 4th shot.
Cheers
Mark http://www.photographicaustralia.com http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
Krystian
These are all excellent and have much stronger appeal for me than your architectural shots. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
I particularly liked the third image. The abstract quality of the photo appealed to me. The strong directional lines of the veins wihin the shapes of the leaf are quite lovely and I also liked the contrast of the shadow. A nice balance.
Krystian a nice collection of shots. By far my favourites are #1 and #3 and I think it's mainly due to the abstract nature (excuse the pun) captured in both. I'm not sure but it might also have to do with the subject filling the entire frame which #1 and #3 both have in common.
Excellent composition on 1 and 3 and the use of a dark background to isolate the main subject.
Individually I think the weakest one is the ferns where is too much going on, but in the set adds a nice contrast to the minimalism of the others Krystian looks like the light is natural but the background is dark, may i ask how you achieved this? Very thoughtful and well planned out photography
Alpha_7,
Or maybe because of different light character. Notice that both images show subject as it would lay on lightbox. Plus both of them are kind of close up, at least much more then others. We can see leaves structure. That differes them form other images, where there is more space. Together it creates interesting illumination Regards, K.Polak
Wendellt,
Thanks. Black background is effect of strong contrast. Plants are directly illuminated by the Sun where as background sits in deep shadow. Difference is at least few serious stops. On top of that add low camera dynamic range and then something must be placed out of it, which in this case is bakcground If you will take carefull look at the last images, you will see, on the right, hint of a hedge behind. Regards, K.Polak
Ah high fstop, very smart, I thought you mocked up some black background backdrop out on location.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|