gstark wrote:dawesy wrote:Power, weight, desire to not have to deal with a computer anywhere near me on a holiday, desire to not buy another computer to do the job of a
PSD...
The only one of those that is valid is a desire to not have a computer nearby when on holiday. That I can accept, but that is an issue of personal choice, and irrelevant to this discussion.
This discussion is entirely about personal choice. The point is that
PSDs have a place. Where you choose a laptop, others choose a
PSD. That may come down to different requirements, however to suggest that your requirements are the only valid ones is, to be diplomatic, wrong.
gstark wrote:Power is not an issue: most laptops will have more power available between charges (longer usable life) than any
PSD.
So? It still runs out of power.
I am yet to find a laptop that runs on
AA batteries, which I can get anywhere, nor am I yet to find one that comes bundled with a 12V charger. In fact many laptop chargers output at above 12V, meaning an inverter is going to be required for me to run it from a 12V source. Let's add some $ to that Laptop proposition.
gstark wrote:Weight: given that most of the weight in a PC comes from the exact same component that gives a
PSD its weight, that's a rather spurious argument. Further, look at something like the Lenovo X300. Way lighter than any
PSD, with way more functionality. No
PSDs come with SSD memory to my knowledge, and thus they are actually now falling into an even bigger hole, because they cannot even claim any minimal weight advantage.
Sure I can get a tiny light laptop, then hang an external USB drive off it... wait, isn't that just a
PSD with no power, card reader or screen? What the hell do I want the laptop for then? To take a decent amount of storage I'm going to end up carrying more weight and needing more room with a laptop of any size. This may not affect your travel, but your means of travel is not the only one available.
gstark wrote:Job??? ROTFLAMO!
What, precisely, is the actual job that a
PSD does? Remember that the purpose of the
PSD is to try to replace the PC - not the other way around, as you seem to be suggesting - but it's a job in which it, IMHO, fails miserably, because its functionality is so heavily compromised by its very design parameters. It starts off severely crippled, and just goes downhill from there.
No. Not even close.
It's job is not to replace a PC. If I wanted a PC, I'd take a laptop and deal with all the issues that presents. I don't. I want off line storage. To house my photos so I can erase my card and keep shooting. It's a simple job, which is why a simple device is all that is required. Why carry more components, that are more fragile, with more power requirements, when I can carry a simple, small box that does all I need? Why have another laptop sitting in my house that I don't even use as a computer?