Close-up filters - Effect on depth of fieldModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Close-up filters - Effect on depth of fieldDoes anyone know how to calculate the depth of field for a given lens and a given aperture when +1, +2 or +4 closeup filters are fitted???
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
I have never experimented much with it, but a while ago I stumbled upon this:
http://ca.geocities.com/lokejul/jlcalc.htm Hopefully you can make some sense out of it. Tristan Canon User
Web: http://www.ozonejunkie.com/ Gallery: http://photos.ozonejunkie.com
Thanks Tristan - Just what I needed... It confirmed my suspicion that I was playing with 0.5mm Depth of Field earlier today - no wonder it was so damned difficult to focus
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Yes, that was the reason that I tried to find this exact program. I bought a +3 close up filter about 3 weeks ago, and whilst playing with it, discovered that focus is really, really touchy. Then I realised how small my DOF was. It took a while to get used to, but I love it these days! Tristan Canon User
Web: http://www.ozonejunkie.com/ Gallery: http://photos.ozonejunkie.com
just curious as to people's thoughts on playing with such a very shallow DOF, with the close-up filters ? Shooting with a DOF of 0.5mm, in my mind, would not be conducive to pleasing photos....leaving foreground/background OOF.
All too often we see people posting amazing macro photos and the comments/critiques that seem to be prevalent in all these is, "nice shot, but it would have been better if the [xxx] was in focus, as well". Unless you are taking photos of salt grains, I don't see how you could ever expect to have a deep enough DOF to obtain fully pleasing macro photos - using these c-up filters. I have thought about getting some c-up's but I keep coming back to this same question. Am I missing something ? Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Thaddeus and I found this image to be quite pleasing... The out of focus areas can introduce nice dreamy effects similar not too dissimilar to the bokeh effect that many strive to achieve in their normal photos... You only get down to .5mm DOF with extremely long lenses and high magnification... Usually you have the luxury of several mms I find that the 52mm Closeup filters work really well on the 50mm and 105mm primes... As you may have seen - I just bought a set for the 80-400VR as well - this was more for the pleasure of experimentation... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|