USM in LAB

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

USM in LAB

Postby Alex on Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:36 pm

Does anyone do USM in Lab mode using what one might initially describe bizzare settings, such as amount: 50-60, radius: 7-20, Threshhold: 1.0?? I thought it was bizzare for the amount to be so small and for radius to be so huge, until I tried it. Boy the results are sharp!! This is dome on "L" channel only.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby mudder on Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:45 pm

G'day mate,

Using a large radius (like 10-50) with a small percentage can be used to increase "contrast" in distant stuff like skies or details in a distant hillside etc...

Try it in a cloudy sky, looks great, or to give the impression of removing "haze" on the details within a distant hillside (like distant farms etc)... Works a treat, but I tend to only do that on things that you don't want to do the "higher percentage/smaller radius/fine grain" smart sharpening of core subject details... If you know what I mean :oops:

Cheers mate.
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby big pix on Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:48 pm

Waiting on my LAB book, then I will be able to understand a lot more........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Alex on Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:06 pm

Thanks for explanation, mudder. BP: the book is great, comes with a CD too, started reading today.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby big pix on Fri Dec 02, 2005 10:13 pm

Alex wrote:Thanks for explanation, mudder. BP: the book is great, comes with a CD too, started reading today.

Alex


You should also get Russell Brown's Photoshop book......... I ordered off his web site....... can't wait to get my hands on the LAB book

http://www.russellbrown.com/tips_tech.html
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Re: USM in LAB

Postby Steffen on Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:16 pm

Alex wrote:Does anyone do USM in Lab mode using what one might initially describe bizzare settings, such as amount: 50-60, radius: 7-20, Threshhold: 1.0?? I thought it was bizzare for the amount to be so small and for radius to be so huge, until I tried it. Boy the results are sharp!! This is dome on "L" channel only.


Very interesting. I just had to try this recipe on one of tonight's end-of-the-world shots. I think, though, the result goes far beyond sharpening, it's almost surreal. Here are the before and after pics, I used amount 55, radius 13 and thresh 1 for the second image:

Image

Image

Maybe I need to fiddle with the knobs a bit, or maybe The GIMP does things differently from Photoshop?

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Steffen on Fri Dec 02, 2005 11:30 pm

I just like to add, I find it interesting how small detail (such as the TV antenna) doesn't get over-sharpened at all, but the roof line gets a halo of sorts. I tried the technique on a few other shots, and everything that sticks out (like tries) gets kind of a holy light around it in front of the clouds. The funny thing is, seeing the picture you know it's fake but it doesn't look fake.

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Alex on Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:19 am

big pix wrote:
Alex wrote:Thanks for explanation, mudder. BP: the book is great, comes with a CD too, started reading today.

Alex


You should also get Russell Brown's Photoshop book......... I ordered off his web site....... can't wait to get my hands on the LAB book

http://www.russellbrown.com/tips_tech.html


Thanks BP,

So many books, so little time.

Alex
User avatar
Alex
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Melbourne - Nikon

Postby MATT on Sun Dec 04, 2005 12:51 pm

Photoshop abillity is awesome, I had a play with the above method with this out come..


Origonal.
Image

Edited
Image



Colours come out different on the web to my print and screen oh well you get the idea.
MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions