Spots?

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Spots?

Postby wally on Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:32 am

Hi you all, as I told youse b4 im new to digital fotografy, but i sometime get these spots on my snaps. Do youse guys clone stuff liked this away or am I doing sumthing wrong? Should I use the hood?

I only has a D70s + std lens, no extra lens at all.

Image


can youse see the blue dots in the top cornner in the sky
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby johnd on Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:47 am

Wally, it's probably what's known as a dust bunny. Small bits of dust get onto the camera's sensor. You can clone them out but sooner or later you'll get sick of them and need to clean the sensor. You can do a dry clean with air from a blower (Giottos Air Rocket or similar) or a wet clean. Never done a wet clean myself, but a search of this site will tell you about it.

I think there is an active group of DSLR members in Adelaide, so might be worth contacting some of them and going along to one of their meets where you could probably see these cleaning techniques demonstrated.

Cheers, John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Mj on Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:18 pm

mmm... not sure this is a dust bunny... would be worth giving the sensor and the lens (both ends) a quick blow clean to check... I can only see one spot in this shot... is it always in the same place?

another possibly is that it is the result of a little flair... the hood would help with this... the other possibility is that is is a fault with coating on the lens... but do not panic yet !!!

start by making sure the lens is clean... then give the sensor a blow... if after either of these cleanup attempts the spot has not at least moved you might need to get someone to have a closer look.
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:34 pm

It's a UFO!!!
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby wally on Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:43 pm

Ta Mj and johnd i think its not dust probably sun spots on the lenss or i thourt it mite be a sensor thing. i got a blower thingo from james place cameras so mite try it. here is nother shot youse can see thes spots r in difrent spots, in the sky in thee left

Image
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby Killakoala on Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:54 pm

Wally, it looks like lens flare. Use the hood and keep it in mind when you are shooting towards the sun.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Greg B on Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:00 pm

Hi wally and welcome to the forum. Hope your stay is long and happy.

In the interests and clarity and effective communication, we are going to need to do a tiny bit of work on your spelling. I know that isn't the main requirement for a photographer (luckily for some members here), but it can't hurt.

Please don't take any offence wally, I just want to help.

"Youse" has got to go. Really. Thanks. It will help get rid of the dust bunnies too. :D
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby wally on Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:12 pm

Ta Steve, will do that

Ta for the welcome Greg, not trying to offence anyone, will spell better now on, i thinks i have dun too much texting. :oops: I normly use http://www.dictionary.com if I am unsure of spelling. here is the link http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=youse


Greg r u knot a jeff fenech fan? :lol: luv you all :lol:
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby Matt. K on Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:19 pm

Greg...Wally
I can see youse are gunna have some fun together. :D :D :D :D Wally. There are a number of literary masterpieces/classics that use spelling in the same way U do. Greg just hasn't read them yet. :D :D :D
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Greg B on Tue Dec 20, 2005 2:27 pm

Thanks for the dictionary.com link wally. Good work - the fact that you youse it brings great joy to me.

Happy days :D
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Killakoala on Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:08 pm

Interestingly, YOUSE is in the dictionary, albeit an American one. ;)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby the foto fanatic on Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:39 pm

Youse roolz:
If youse are gunna use youse, youse'll have to use it sparingly. :lol:
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Dec 20, 2005 3:58 pm

The word has been used by a close friend of mine for years (an Aussie) and when I took him to task, he said it was in the dictionary. It is an archaic word.

But check this: http://www.abc.net.au/wordmap/rel_stories/youse.htm
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Greg B on Tue Dec 20, 2005 4:56 pm

wally, you have got these blokes playing up already. Congratulations for that.

But with respect to my fellow members, I couldn't give a dead rat's arse if youse is in the dictionary. :shock:

It must go. In my view. :)
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Sheetshooter on Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:24 pm

A copy of Strunk & White or Fowler might not go astray either.
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt

Postby MCWB on Tue Dec 20, 2005 5:48 pm

Sheetshooter wrote:A copy of Strunk & White or Fowler might not go astray either.

Ask and ye shall receive: Strunk & White, and Fowler.

Back on topic, it looks like lens flare to me. Clone it out, and next time youse the hood. :)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Matt. K on Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:58 pm

The trick is not to abuse or overuse youse. Bound to give Geg. B the bloose. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby wally on Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:59 pm

Ta everyone for the big wellcome you are the frendlest guys on the web with a grate sense of huemour thanks and your ozzie oi oi oi :D

Greg b out of respect forr u being a moderaytor no more youse i really only use it for respect 4 our champ jeff fenech, my mates thinks it is funny but - U D boss so no more youse

sir hc - r u a real sir or knite? ta for the links, grate to see the rich bird who prints the macqarrie agrees with me

MR WB Ta for the links - i new strunk and wite with elementts of style - i had a trendy pad wen i was yunger and was a bit of a hit with the Ladies but did not now fowler - i thourt u guys was teazing me with toilet jokes :lol: is your name short for Mister wite balance

i will go an rite on the blackbored 1000 times i mus use the hood :lol: :lol:


ta agin for the big wellcome - i reelly likes u guys
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby gstark on Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:09 pm

Greg B wrote:wally, you have got these blokes playing up already. Congratulations for that.

But with respect to my fellow members, I couldn't give a dead rat's arse if youse is in the dictionary. :shock:

It must go. In my view. :)


I'm in agreement with this. The mere fact that a word exists, or is published in a dictionary, is not an exhortation that it be used. That would be akin to suggesting that because Sigma lenses are made to fit Nikon bodies, they should be so mounted upon one.

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:13 pm

gstark wrote: That would be akin to suggesting that because Sigma lenses are made to fit Nikon bodies, they should be so mounted upon one.

:)


Don’t get me started :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:23 pm

If ya'll (see, that what I use) don't go back on topic, I'm gonna have to close this thread.

Don't make me be the voice of reason or authority on these boards.
Ya'll know I hate that.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby dooda on Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:31 pm

Yeowza! Thems Hella tight fo real! Don't be dissin'!
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby mudder on Tue Dec 20, 2005 8:27 pm

I've just spent the last 5 minutes giggling reading this thread, I've enjoyed it thanks Wally :lol:

Back to the issue though, I assume it's flare due to the color of the spot, I thought dust bunnies would usually just ge a grey'ish artefact :?

The direction of the shadows doesn't suggest you're shooting into the sun enough to get flare though, so I'm a smidge confused (although that's not unusual)... And just the single consistent blue spot too???

When you say standard lens, which is that? I couldn't get EXIF from the images here... Also are you using any filters on the lens?
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby wally on Tue Dec 20, 2005 9:12 pm

hey mudder - tanks for the help i think it is sun flair coz its on a shot i has of victorai sq with the sun in it - ta for evrything u guys r very frendly and helpfull - if any1 needs computer help jus ask i can return the help
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Dec 20, 2005 10:08 pm

I think he means the kit lens.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:01 pm

Great avatar Wally, did you take it yourself ??
:lol:
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby mudder on Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:06 pm

Nnnnsic wrote:I think he means the kit lens.


Yeah, was wondering whether it was the 18-70DX kit lens or 18-55 maybe???

When I've experienced flare on my 18-70 I've usually got the multi-colored ones assumedly due to the multi-coatings on the lens... That's why I was intrigued with the single blue spot... :? Maybe I just don't understand the reasons flares happen?

Wally, which lens mate?
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby stubbsy on Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:58 am

Wally

I've fought and fought the urge to talk about your mangling of the language, but can hold back no longer :lol: :wink:

I'd suggest that while it might be OK to use texting shorthand on a mobile phone for reasons of economy, here it's better etiquette to use the slightly longer form of the language (things like "you are" instead of U R) since there is not such a restriction on the size of your message. Additionally for old fogeys like me and many others here the texting shorthand can be a BIG distraction from the content of your postings.

Of course U R free 2 disregard this plea, but it would gr8 if U didn't - K :wink:

And back on topic - like Andrew, these spots are a puzzle to me. How many of your shots have the spot? All of them or just some. If all of them I'd say you may have a problem with your equipment. They don't look like lens flare to me, but if they are only on a few shots then that's probably what they are.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby wally on Wed Dec 21, 2005 9:20 am

Hi Mudder its jus the lens wich comes with it the af-s nikkor 18-70 1:3.5-4.5g ed i have a few other shots with flair in them wich i took in the city - lots have sunn in them so thats probly the problim - most snaps are sweet

ta subbsy for the heds up - i dun way tooo much texting so will make sure i rite long here its not jus yoo - peeple at work complain my email is hard to read they even sudgested i do an english corse - i larfed at them coz i am ozzie an all those corses are wat we send forigners tooo :lol: don worry you can say anything to me -i am wat my boss calls a rowbust caracter :lol:


luv you all :lol:
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions

cron