200+ mm macro??!!

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

200+ mm macro??!!

Postby rookie2 on Sat Feb 04, 2006 11:53 pm

excuse my igonrance but can someone explain the capabilities of a 200+ mm macro lens.

I understand it would save my back from not having to bend over/stoop so low to get to some plants bugs because of the longer focal length etc but what would it offer in the area of taking action shots in sport or Is the lens constructed specifically for macro shots.

I have the nikkor 70 - 300 ED - would something like the Sigma 70 -300 APO super macro be better for these two uses or do they just add the wording 'macro' on without really adding anything to the lens.

alternatively would aNikkor 300 f2.8 serve both purposes?

As always your informative feedback is appreciated.

cheersR2 :oops:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Rookie2

http://www.DLdigital.smugmug.com
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Re: 200+ mm macro??!!

Postby rokkstar on Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:15 am

rookie2 wrote:
I have the nikkor 70 - 300 ED - would something like the Sigma 70 -300 APO super macro be better for these two uses or do they just add the wording 'macro' on without really adding anything to the lens.


I've got the sigma 70-300 macro and while a useful addition to the 'lens' I wouldnt compare it to a proper macro. It's produced some ok results but if I wanted to get into macro I would definately invest in a dedicated lens.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

70 - 300

Postby rookie2 on Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:26 am

thanks Matt
just looked at some of your stuff on line - very impressive
did you use the 70 -300 for the butterfy/bee shots?
any sports shots with the same lens?
cheers R2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Rookie2

http://www.DLdigital.smugmug.com
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Postby james m on Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:32 am

you could use your 70-300 ED for some macro work by using extension tubes or a Nikon 5T/6T close up attachment lens.
james m
Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:14 pm
Location: Auburn | Sydney

its a mugs life! oops bugs life

Postby rookie2 on Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:59 am

Image
thanks James ...this is one of only a few keepers after using the ext.tubes and the kit lens 18 -70 a while back. pretty rough but a start.
getting enough light, getting DOF, focussing, minimising shake - even with tripod...I've got a long way to go but its good fun...and now I dont feel so bad about posting my first efforts..good encouragement to get out and do better.
thanks for looking
cheers
R2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Rookie2

http://www.DLdigital.smugmug.com
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA

Postby Finch on Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:09 pm

R2,

One of the positives of a 200mm macro (as compared to a 55-60mm or 105mm) is that when you are shooting things like butterflies (which spook easy) you don't have to get as close as with the smaller focal-length macro lenses. A 200mm macro can be used as a normal lens as well, not just macro.

Hope this helps

Cheers

Michael
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane

Postby rookie2 on Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:57 pm

thanks Michael..I'll start looking over the reviews of various macros but may stick with my 70 - 300 and Ext tubes til I get a lot more consistent shots before going to a specialist lens.
cheers
R2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Rookie2

http://www.DLdigital.smugmug.com
rookie2
Senior Member
 
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:45 am
Location: Brighton SA


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions