Tripod heads again??

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Tripod heads again??

Postby MarkF on Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:52 pm

Just buying a CF tripod and have become unstuck as for what Head!! I would like to do some surfing pics with a 30D and 400 lens (action) and also some panorama type work. is there a head that has that flexability. Thanks :?:
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:03 pm

Welcome to the forum Markf.

I use a Markins M20, there is also the RRS BH55 and finally the Benro K2. The first 2 heads are fairly expensive compared to the Benro. They are ballheads and would suit your application admirably.

I am sure there will be others who will give their preferences :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby birddog114 on Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:54 am

MarkF,
Depend on what's your budget?
Not the head only is required, there're many options to follow after you get the ballhead or tripod head.
As Chris said: there're few of them around.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Budgets Vs Satisfaction

Postby MarkF on Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:16 am

Thanks, geez you guys are promt! Yes it does come down to how much to spend but my experience is that it is best to get the right thing in the first place. I need a head that will be smooth in opperation with about 5kg on it, lens mounted, QR plate for versatility, excelent tension adjustment to allow smooth object tracking and good horrizontal panning control. Is this to much to ask of one head? :?:
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA

Postby Glen on Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:59 am

Mark, great advice from the guys above, I can recommend the RRS BH55. Expensive but works.

http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/ballheads/index.html
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Re: Budgets Vs Satisfaction

Postby birddog114 on Tue Aug 08, 2006 9:04 am

MarkF wrote:Thanks, geez you guys are promt! Yes it does come down to how much to spend but my experience is that it is best to get the right thing in the first place. I need a head that will be smooth in opperation with about 5kg on it, lens mounted, QR plate for versatility, excelent tension adjustment to allow smooth object tracking and good horrizontal panning control. Is this to much to ask of one head? :?:


MarkF
Here's my ideas:
- A suitable ballhead (RRS/ Arcatech/ Markins/ Benro) with Arca Swiss type.
- An L bracket for camera body which is designed with Arca Swiss type
- Arca Swiss type lens plates or replacement lens foot
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Guroos on Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:16 pm

I have used an Arca Swis ballhead in the past and can recommend it as being very good if somewhat expensive.

Cheers

Neil
Guroos
Newbie
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: Randwick, NSW

Postby mark on Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:26 pm

I have a Manfrotto 488RC4 Midi Ball Head. Only had it for a couple of weeks now but am more than happy with it either on tripod or monopod for surfing shots, which I take a few of. :wink:
Also it didn't cost too much.
User avatar
mark
Member
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:56 am
Location: Byron Bay | Northern NSW

To Benro or Not??

Postby MarkF on Tue Aug 08, 2006 9:58 pm

Thanks again Guys. I have looked at the RRS & Markins gear, looks good but am gaging a bit on the price. How does the Benro comare in operation etc. Does the price saving come with a penalty?
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA

Postby Glen on Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:13 pm

MarkF, in life most cost savings come with a penalty :lol: I have only used the Benro for 5 minutes and own the RRS, The RRS is much better but I think the Benro seems adequate. I think someone who has the Benro would be better qualified to answer, but if the Benro was all I planned ever to spend I would buy that as it good value for money, If I thought I may one day get better I would just get better as it is better (the RRS, I don't have a Markins but people I know who do speak highly of them)
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Bob G on Tue Aug 08, 2006 10:37 pm

I think you would probably get great results with the 400 on a wimberley head

Bob G
Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
User avatar
Bob G
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:52 am
Location: Mooloolaba, Sunshine Coast, Qld.

Bob G. Huh?

Postby MarkF on Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:15 am

Bob G wrote:I think you would probably get great results with the 400 on a wimberley head

Bob G

Hi Bob, thanks for you reply but as a beginner i guess i have the right to be a bit slow and ask you what is the "400", and I have not heard of a "Wimberley" head either. Who makes them?
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA

Re: Bob G. Huh?

Postby birddog114 on Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:04 am

MarkF wrote:
Bob G wrote:I think you would probably get great results with the 400 on a wimberley head

Bob G

Hi Bob, thanks for you reply but as a beginner i guess i have the right to be a bit slow and ask you what is the "400", and I have not heard of a "Wimberley" head either. Who makes them?


MarkF,
What BobG said "400" is the 400mm lens, it's a huge lens and heavy.
Information about Wimberley is here:
http://www.tripodhead.com/

I have the Wimberley head II + The Sidekick, althought I don't have or selling these toys but happy to give you more advice if required.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Re: Bob G. Huh?

Postby MarkF on Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:22 am

MarkF,
What BobG said "400" is the 400mm lens, it's a huge lens and heavy.
Information about Wimberley is here:
http://www.tripodhead.com/

I have the Wimberley head II + The Sidekick, althought I don't have or selling these toys but happy to give you more advice if required.[/quote]

Thanks for your patience. Well bugger me another new thing. the gimble heads look extreemly versatile and i agree that they must be the thing for tele lenses. I think i will start with the ball head however. Do you think the side kick arm measures up?
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA

Postby birddog114 on Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:29 am

MarkF,
The Sidekick works OK with the 400/ 500/ 600mm(Required proper lens plate).
But it's not so versatile coz those size up from 400mm is so heavy, not easy to manoeuvre.
I recommend the full Wimberley Head II if you can afford it.
Ball head will work also, but at least with the RRS BH-55 (Lens plate is also required), other small ballhead may not holding and panning those beasts well or smoothly.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

To 55 or 40

Postby MarkF on Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:59 am

Thaks guys! I am now wondering if the RRS BH40 is up to the task as opposed to the weight of the BH55 (800 odd grams), or should i not be so soft and just cary the weight?
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA

Re: To 55 or 40

Postby birddog114 on Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:06 am

MarkF wrote:Thaks guys! I am now wondering if the RRS BH40 is up to the task as opposed to the weight of the BH55 (800 odd grams), or should i not be so soft and just cary the weight?


MarkF,

BH40, I also have it, it's too small and expensive, pricing is not much difference from the BH55, and its design far less versatile then the BH-55.
You'll hate it once you got it.

BH55 is the only one for you to consider if you don't want to become a reseller for RRS :wink:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Thanks Thanks

Postby MarkF on Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:09 pm

I have decided to take onboard your advice and will look to an RRS BH55 head and accessories to start with. Thankyou for all your input.
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA

Postby Glen on Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:15 pm

Mark, I hope you noted how helpful we all were to spend your money :lol:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby MarkF on Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:17 pm

Yes thanks for that.
MarkF
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 7:36 am
Location: Bonnet Hill TASMANIA


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions