Autostitch let me down for the first time...

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Autostitch let me down for the first time...

Postby leek on Sun Apr 10, 2005 9:16 pm

Up til now, i've used Autostitch to do my panos without any ill effects...

However, today I tried something different... A 3x3 capture of a Sydney office building...

I provided Autostitch with the following input photos:

ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage

And after thinking for a VERY, VERY, VERY long time... it provided me with this:

Image

Not quite what I was expecting... so what did I do wrong? Do I need to change one of the many parameters in Autostitch to reduce the vertical squashing (for want of a better term)???

Any suggestions about how I could capture a more accurate impression of the height of these buildings???

Would Panofactory have produced a better result???
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby sheepie on Sun Apr 10, 2005 9:28 pm

I dunno - but it looks pretty cool!
*** When getting there is half the fun! ***
User avatar
sheepie
Key Member
 
Posts: 3029
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Picnic Point, Sydney Australia *** Nikon D200/D70 ***

Postby kipper on Sun Apr 10, 2005 9:38 pm

Looks like it's tried to do a few corrections (barrel distortion?) and maybe you want to keep that effect?
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Mon Apr 11, 2005 11:23 am

Maybe try the top three first..

then the next..

then the next..

then put those finished three shots in and see how it handles it.. you're just doing seperately what it should handle all in one hit, but I think it's just too much for the program to handle..

Good luck though..
PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby AlistairF on Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:48 pm

Try taking more pics with a longer focal length (eg. 50-70mm). This will result in a pano with less distortion to correct your problem.

Alistair
User avatar
AlistairF
Member
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby xorl on Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:37 pm

The final pano looks really good considering the amount of perspective and barrel distotion in the source pictures. You could reduce the distortion with a shift lens. Otherwise take the pictures from a further away or a higher location.
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions