Expired ISO400 Fujifilm 36 exp (2005)Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Expired ISO400 Fujifilm 36 exp (2005)G'day film buffs,
I've forcing myself to wait until after PMA to upgrade from film SLR/Digital Compact to a 30D (just in case something special is announced) so I've dusted off my trusty EOS500N and have been snapping away, getting back into the groove of using an SLR. I've been using film I bought in 2003 and I just realised today that it expired in 2005. It is ISO400 Fujifilm 36 exposure film that hasn't been refrigerated, but it has been stored in a reasonably consistently cool & dark cupboard (circa 15-20degC). I did a bit of googling and found a number of film enthusiasts who actively seek out expired film at markets/on ebay, etc and found they do it for one of two reasons: a) cost - they shoot so much film and are willing to take the risk; b) thrill-seekers - they love the potential for "unknown" outcomes in the picture - strange hues, random artifacts, sometimes even perfect shots - this angle seems fairly odd, but piques my creative interests Anyway, I've got around 40 rolls left of this film so I'm going to put my 'thrill seeker' hat on and see what prevails - not caring about the potential to waste film lets me play around with exposure bracketing, among other things - and with the V8's coming to Adelaide in a few weeks, I'll have plenty of material to shoot Will post any interesting results in a few weeks - meanwhile, anyone else used expired film and gotten anything interesting out of the experience? Cheers Leigh
My local film man sells recent out of date for $ 1.00 or $2.00 per roll - depending on film speed and wether 24/36. Great results.
I have used 3 -4 years old ISO 200 and 400 Fuji Superia - results aren't too bad just don't blow prints up too large. I also had some seven year old Fuji Superia ISO 400. Very grainy. I bought some old Velvia in Singapore Airport for a low price - not worth using, each roll came out differently- some good some bad.
Leigh,
It all depends upon the storage conditions. If the film has been kept cool, then it will be fine. Try a roll or three and see what comes out: that will give you an idea of what the rest will be like. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
My Dad took some shots on expired film with his DSLR: they all had a uniform red/crimson wash over them - as if through a massively dense lens filter. I scanned them onto my computer and corrected them using Levels in photoshop - the detail on the photos was okay, actually. But you do lose a bit in the process. I have no idea if this is a typical outcome...
That would be quite a feat. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Sorry about that. I just couldn't resist.
g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Not if he had that prototype Leica with the exchangeable back. Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
If the film turns out to be ordinary, I would be happy to pick up a few rolls for an appropriate price as I want to practice home developing (and will therefore waste numerous rolls of film getting them open, too much agitation, etc).
I will follow this thread. Cheers P Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935. Our mug is smug
Bah. I spent hours last night trying to get my web hosting working (using Joomla/Coppermine) so that I could upload some of the photos and share my results, but the hosting server is hosed (anything php related is dying) and they're taking their sweet time about fixing it. *grr*
Many of us use Dreamhost. Prices and facilities are at least as good as what you've mentioned, and mostly, everything just works. And support ... sometimes slowish, but manned by people. Real, warm, bodies. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
A number of the guys from work also use Dreamhost I found out yesterday - an interesting looking company (employee owned) vs what little I know about aplus.net - I will say one thing for aplus.net - their front-line support has *always* been instant (no waiting around) - they generally were able to answer my questions fairly quickly but if anything needed to be done by an admin, it took days. I'm still within my 30 day money back guarantee period so I might chat with the guys more seriously at work and test-drive some dreamhosting. Nothing I've done isn't portable Cheers Leigh
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|