Many of our members still have film cameras. And some even use them! This is for film junkies
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
by Reschsmooth on Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:18 pm
I have an FE which I use from time to time and a simple 35mm 2.8 lens. I am thinking of rolling up 36 exposures of Tri-X (that's film, Geoff  ), loading it into the camera, taking a shot, and then mailing the camera and lens onto someone else (from this forum), who takes one shot, and then posts the camera off to someone else (from this forum). At the end, the camera, lens and film are sent back to me, I develop the film and have it scanned before loading the photos up onto our Smugmug gallery site, posting the link onto here (mods/admin permitting, I could post small thumbnail links, bearing in mind we are talking up to 36 shots). Whilst the FE is not worth a hell of a lot of money, it still is worth a little bit, so there is a huge element of trust involved. Accordingly, I would impose the following rules: 1. Only forum members who have been on here for a year or have a minimum of 500 posts can participate (sorry, but with only 36 shots, I can afford to be picky). 2. Posting can only be within Australia (which shouldn't be a problem). 3. Only Express or Registered post can be used, and the person shipping the camera each time pays for postage (if you don't want to pay, that's fine, you just can't participate). 4. One shot per person. 5. Each person involved must post on here (this thread or a new one) that they received the camera, the shot number when they receive the camera, to whom they wish to post it, and that they have posted it. 6. Each person must pass on the camera within 2 business days. 7. If you decide that you are going to bugger off with the camera/lens, then it has cost me over $100 to work out you are a wan.... This would just be an exercise in fun - to see what single shot a person would take. Please indicate if you wish to participate here - if no interest, that's perfectly fine. Ok, here is the current list of people who have expressed interest who are 'eligible' according to my criteria: 1. Reschsmooth 2. aim54x 3. Pa 4. Firsty 5. radar 6. Ant (member for 3 years) 7. PiroStitch? 8. ATJ 9. dviv 10. foonji 11. colin_12 12. Antsl 13. Critter (member for 2 years) 14. Paul 15. Geoff 16. CraigVTR 17. Mr Darcy? 18. Oneputt 19. Oz_Beachside? 20. rflower 21. Wendell Gary, I wasn't sure if you were actually interested in participating or not? There are a couple of people who, I'm afraid, didn't meet the criteria who I have had to exclude - I apologise if it seems unfair, but I have had to impose some limits. Those on the list with question marks didn't express explicit interest, but I implied it - let me know if I am wrong? cheers
Last edited by Reschsmooth on Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:58 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by aim54x on Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:42 pm
it is a great idea.... I am interested. Keep me posted as to how this goes.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by Pa on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:01 am
Hi Pat
And a good one...I will be interested to check out the images from this.
If this happens after the Christmas period. will you add me to the list.
Thanks Pat
-

Pa
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:07 pm
- Location: old bar, NSW 2430
by firsty on Tue Dec 16, 2008 8:53 am
Having never shot with a film SLR I have no idea what I would come up with but I'm in Tri-X ? is that B&W and what speed/iso is it to give me a start point so I don't end up with a black frame for my trouble
-

firsty
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 12:34 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills Sydney - D200
by aim54x on Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:01 am
firsty wrote:Having never shot with a film DSLR I have no idea what I would come up with but I'm in Tri-X ? is that B&W and what speed/iso is it to give me a start point so I don't end up with a black frame for my trouble
Correct, 400 ISO Tri-X is a B&W film described as "fine grain, wide exposure latitude,high sharpness, high resolving power" by Kodak. I have never used Tri-X but it will be interesting. Dont worry too much, listen to the meter on the FE (also a camera that I have not used before) and you will produce something that can be printed, keep in mind that negative film is a lot more forgiving than digital.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by radar on Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:06 am
Pat, I was worried when I saw the title and you as the poster However, after reading the post, I think it's a great idea Put my name down. Cheers, André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
-

radar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
- Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
-
by Reschsmooth on Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:19 am
Yep, Tri-X is a 400 speed film, although could be rated at about 320. The metering on the FE is really simple - I believe it is matrix metering and operates on an aperture priority basis. Adjust the aperture using the aperture ring on the lens, and it will indicate the recommended shutter speed. Even a DSLRUser could us....... 
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Ant on Tue Dec 16, 2008 10:49 am
Not enough posts to participate, but I would love to see the results of this.
Ant.
D90 | D50 | Tamron 17-50 2.8| AF-S 18-55 DX (and VR) | Sigma 70 - 300 APO DG | 50mm 1.8 | SB-600
-

Ant
- Member
-
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:29 pm
- Location: Lyndhurst, Melbourne
-
by PiroStitch on Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:19 am
Let's hope resulting pics don't involve the lens or camera being inside erm...pants.
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by ATJ on Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:24 am
PiroStitch wrote:Let's hope resulting pics don't involve the lens or camera being inside erm...pants.
Um, what's more scary is that you even thought of that.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by ATJ on Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:25 am
Patrick,
I am certainly interested, but I wouldn't want to take the spot of someone more creative. i.e. count me in if you don't get 36 people.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by tommyg on Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:00 pm
I'm happy to give it a go ... only problem would be when the camera arrives I would be so tempted to get the film developed to se what has been shot so far 
-
tommyg
- Member
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 11:36 am
- Location: Mawson Lakes, Adelaide
by dviv on Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:08 pm
I'm keen 
7D, 60D, 70-200mm f/4LIS, 17-50mm f/2.8, 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 50mm f/1.4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX II
-

dviv
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:50 am
- Location: North Shore, Sydney
by foonji on Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:18 pm
I'd be interested.
-
foonji
- Member
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:55 pm
by biggerry on Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:45 pm
inside erm...pants.
he he...that was my first thought - imagine the look on your face when you got them back  takes me back to the school days with peoples cameras at parties.... whilst I do not have the required post count, and would probably bugger up my only shot (never used film) I would be interested in seeing the results...even the pants shots *cringes*
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by aim54x on Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:47 pm
biggerry wrote:inside erm...pants.
he he...that was my first thought - imagine the look on your face when you got them back  takes me back to the school days with peoples cameras at parties.... whilst I do not have the required post count, and would probably bugger up my only shot (never used film) I would be interested in seeing the results...even the pants shots *cringes*
Gerry you have some fine film lenses so if you want I can lend you my FM2n and you can get some practice!
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by biggerry on Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:59 pm
lend you my FM2n and you can get some practice!
i'm gonna take you up on that offer and yes, I have some fine old lenses that would work a treat 
-

biggerry
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 5930
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:40 am
- Location: Under the flight path, Newtown, Sydney
-
by Reschsmooth on Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:38 pm
PiroStitch wrote:Let's hope resulting pics don't involve the lens or camera being inside erm...pants.
The lens isn't a macro lens! 
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by colin_12 on Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:40 pm
I would like to be in on this as well please Pat. Been to long since I shot any real film.
Regards Colin Cameras, lenses and a lust for life
-

colin_12
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:10 pm
- Location: Hazelbrook
by gstark on Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:45 pm
Reschsmooth wrote:The metering on the FE is really simple - I believe it is matrix metering and operates on an aperture priority basis. Adjust the aperture using the aperture ring on the lens, and it will indicate the recommended shutter speed.
Centre weighted, IIRC. 8 degrees, aperture priority. My recollection is that matrix metering didn't exist till the advent of the FA, maybe 1988? I'll check later to confirm. Metering is dead easy: set the camera to A. Set the aperture as desired, and check in the LH edge of the finder: The black needle shows you the metered shutter speed; the green one shows you what your selection is, and that should be "A". If we want to have a training session with one of these before we start, I have an FE2 here as well, and we can also rope in any members' FM series bodies, which are essentially the same, except that they're fully manual. Oh yes ... great idea, Patrick.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Antsl on Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:00 pm
Fantastic idea ... count me in if the camera is coming through Melbourne. 
-

Antsl
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
- Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!
-
by Reschsmooth on Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:02 pm
Antsl wrote:Fantastic idea ... count me in if the camera is coming through Melbourne. 
The camera will be like new!
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Critter on Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:26 pm
what a great idea, I am not in the running, but it will be great to see what everyone else comes up with once it is done!
Chris D300 | D80 | 14-24 f/2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 35 f/2 | 105VR f/2.8 | 18-200VR | SB600 | R1 | GP-1 |
-

Critter
- Member
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:52 pm
- Location: Bardon, Brisbane
by radar on Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:56 pm
As a totally optional step in this great idea, it would be interesting to see those that participate to also take a DSLR photo at the same settings and then to do a b&w conversion, same composition as close as possible. So for the DX crowd, they would take a photo with a 20mm or 24mm lens or at 24mm on a zoom and the FX crowd would do it at 35mm. Participants would wait till Patrick has posted the developed TRI-X version to post their version. Just a thought, feel free to "shoot" me down André
Last edited by radar on Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
-

radar
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
- Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000
-
by Paul on Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:08 pm
Count me in 
Nikon F80D, FM2n RRS BH-55, 055XPROB Smugmug
-

Paul
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
- Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia
-
by Geoff on Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:49 pm
Count me in too please Patrick! Fantastic idea!
-

Geoff
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
- Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.
-
by aim54x on Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:15 am
gstark wrote:If we want to have a training session with one of these before we start, I have an FE2 here as well, and we can also rope in any members' FM series bodies, which are essentially the same, except that they're fully manual.
I'm organising to lend Gerry my FM2n but if there is to be a mini meet where you want FM's and FE's then I can bring mine along if I can make it.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by ATJ on Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:18 am
I have an FE2, too (Effie tutu?), which hopefully still works.
-

ATJ
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3982
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
-
by Reschsmooth on Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:43 am
I will aim to get a list of those expressing interest up shortly. As a reminder about eligibility, it is restricted to those who have been members for at least a year (amended to also require 100+ posts in that time) OR 500+ posts, thereby accomodating professional posters such as Cameron  . This is an exercise in trust. I am deciding about whether to kick this off before or after the start of the Sydney Test.
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by aim54x on Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:30 am
Reschsmooth wrote:As a reminder about eligibility, it is restricted to those who have been members for at least a year (amended to also require 100+ posts in that time) OR 500+ posts, thereby accomodating professional posters such as Cameron  .
Thanks Patrick. I was about to say that I am not eligible.
Cameron Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura BlackScout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
-

aim54x
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7305
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
- Location: Penshurst, Sydney
-
by gstark on Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:35 am
Reschsmooth wrote:This is an exercise in trust.
And as such, I recognise and support any measures that Patrick deems appropriate in this exercise.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by gstark on Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:58 am
gstark wrote:Reschsmooth wrote:The metering on the FE is really simple - I believe it is matrix metering and operates on an aperture priority basis. Adjust the aperture using the aperture ring on the lens, and it will indicate the recommended shutter speed.
Centre weighted, IIRC. 8 degrees, aperture priority. My recollection is that matrix metering didn't exist till the advent of the FA, maybe 1988? I'll check later to confirm.
Ok, I now have a PDF of the FE manual. Metering is CW, favours "the central 12mm diameter area" (focus screen). Matrix metering ... the forerunner of Matrix was what Nikon called Automatic Multi-Pattern Metering. This was in the FA, but I'm still researching if this was its first appearance. I should have more details on this later today, or sometime tomorrow.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by CraigVTR on Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:39 pm
Would love to participate. My old Ricoh died many years ago and I have not shot on film since. 
Craig Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
-

CraigVTR
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
- Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
-
by PiroStitch on Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:14 pm
Can I make a suggestion (don't worry it's legitimate)?
After you take a pic, post what the counter is up to that way you can track who took what photo and where the camera currently is?
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Mr Darcy on Wed Dec 17, 2008 2:17 pm
What about bending the rules for newbies who are related to established members ( I can think of a few  )
Greg It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
-

Mr Darcy
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3414
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains
by gstark on Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:01 pm
PiroStitch wrote:After you take a pic, post what the counter is up to that way you can track who took what photo and where the camera currently is?
Wayne, sort of like what was in point 5 of Patrick's suggestion in his original post in this thread? Reschsmooth wrote:5. Each person involved must post on here (this thread or a new one) that they received the camera, the shot number when they receive the camera, to whom they wish to post it, and that they have posted it. 
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Reschsmooth on Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:44 pm
gstark wrote:Wayne, sort of like what was in point 5 of Patrick's suggestion in his original post in this thread?
Gary, take it easy on Wayne: Wayne's profile wrote:Location: Sth Suburbs, Melbourne

Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by Oneputt on Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:31 pm
I would like to participate in this 
-

Oneputt
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
- Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.
-
by gstark on Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:43 pm
Reschsmooth wrote:gstark wrote:Wayne, sort of like what was in point 5 of Patrick's suggestion in his original post in this thread?
Gary, take it easy on Wayne: Wayne's profile wrote:Location: Sth Suburbs, Melbourne
Patrick, I thought that I was. But you know, it could be worse ... Someone else's profile wrote:Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by PiroStitch on Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:58 pm
Lol sorry  Don't worry about it  I understand Gary's sense of humour  All is good 
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
by Oz_Beachside on Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:33 pm
what a great idea. very interested to see the results! (it would be a welcome challenge to get just one frame off). 
-

Oz_Beachside
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2227
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Black Rock, Victoria. D200
by rflower on Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:26 pm
I would be interested ... I think I am (almost) elligible
Russell Nikon D700 // 50 1.4 // 70-200 2.8 VRII // 24-120 f4// Tamron 90 // SB-800 // 70-300G I'm on Redbubble too ... http://www.redbubble.com/people/rflowerIf you can make one of my photos look better and you have the inclination ... please do so.
-

rflower
- Member
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: Hoppers Crossing, Melbourne
-
by wendellt on Thu Dec 18, 2008 9:51 am
hi this is a fantastic dea i want to join
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by Reschsmooth on Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:20 am
wendellt wrote:hi this is a fantastic dea i want to join
I forgot to mention to mention that, to be eligible, you can't have lost or broken any camera gear in the last month. Of course you're in, Wendell. 
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by CraigVTR on Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:23 am
Reschsmooth wrote:wendellt wrote:hi this is a fantastic dea i want to join
I forgot to mention to mention that, to be eligible, you can't have lost or broken any camera gear in the last month. Of course you're in, Wendell. 
Just make Wendellt the last shooter. 
Craig Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
-

CraigVTR
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
- Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
-
by Reschsmooth on Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:25 am
CraigVTR wrote:Reschsmooth wrote:wendellt wrote:hi this is a fantastic dea i want to join
I forgot to mention to mention that, to be eligible, you can't have lost or broken any camera gear in the last month. Of course you're in, Wendell. 
Just make Wendellt the last shooter. 
Logically, you would make him the first shooter 
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by wendellt on Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:37 am
ha ha funny people
ive only lost my own stuff to record anything i borrow is never lost and in returned in the ame condition with a bottle of the finest vintage red
-

wendellt
- Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
-
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
- Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney
-
by CraigVTR on Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:48 am
wendellt wrote:ha ha funny people
ive only lost my own stuff to record anything i borrow is never lost and in returned in the ame condition with a bottle of the finest vintage red
All the people I know will allways treat a friends belongings much better than they would do so if they were there own. I know I would hate to break something that was lent to me. You are obviously in that category as well. 
Craig Lifes journey is not to arrive at our grave in a well preserved body but, rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Wow what a ride." D70s, D300, 70-300ED, 18-70 Kit Lens, Nikkor 105 Micro. Manfrotto 190Prob Ball head. SB800 x 2.
-

CraigVTR
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:09 pm
- Location: Montville, Sunshine Coast, Queensland
-
by Reschsmooth on Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:31 am
wendellt wrote:ha ha funny people
ive only lost my own stuff to record anything i borrow is never lost and in returned in the ame condition with a bottle of the finest vintage red
You have my complete faith, Wendell. 
Regards, Patrick
Two or three lights, any lens on a light-tight box are sufficient for the realisation of the most convincing image. Man Ray 1935.
Our mug is smug
-

Reschsmooth
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
- Location: Just next to S'nives.
-
by PiroStitch on Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:10 pm
wendellt wrote:ha ha funny people
ive only lost my own stuff to record anything i borrow is never lost and in returned in the ame condition with a bottle of the finest vintage red
to vouch for wendell...he didnt break my house 
-

PiroStitch
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4669
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
- Location: Hong Kong
-
Return to Film and Non-Digital Imaging
|