Page 1 of 1
Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?
Posted:
Tue Jun 17, 2008 1:41 pmby wheels
Really, what is the difference? Are we mere mortals going to be able to tell?
Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?
Posted:
Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:14 pmby foonji
I own the MkII and absolutely love it! awesome lens!
from my understanding the MkII has removed CA issues and Better Performance on FF on wide end around the edges...
Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?
Posted:
Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:37 pmby adam
There appears to be a difference (apart from the 82mm filter thread
)
If you want to have a peep, this is good!
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revi ... nsComp=412
Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?
Posted:
Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:58 pmby petal666
Looks to have a bit better resolving power. I've owned both and currently own the mkII. Can't tell the difference in real world use.
Re: Canon 16-35mm F2.8L Mk I or Mk II?
Posted:
Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:34 pmby wheels
Thanks for the heads up Adam, but even with that review I don't think it will make that much of a difference day to day. Save a bit o cash buying the Mk I tho!