Please talk me out of it!

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Please talk me out of it!

Postby MattyO on Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:11 am

Okay people. Here is the deal looking at buying a D300 very soon.

But i need to be certain on 1 thing Nikon D300 AF system, is it better... IE more accurate and faster focus tracking than the d2xs.

Is teh cam3500dx better than the cam2500
MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au
http://www.mattyo.com.au

WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography
http://www.circlework.com.au
CAMS Accreditated

D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Please talk me out of it!

Postby Yi-P on Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:47 am

MattyO wrote:Okay people. Here is the deal looking at buying a D300 very soon.

But i need to be certain on 1 thing Nikon D300 AF system, is it better... IE more accurate and faster focus tracking than the d2xs.

Is teh cam3500dx better than the cam2500


I think the D300 AF system is slightly better than the D2xs, if by any difference apart from the excessive amounts of focus points.

Nevertheless, the D2Xs AF is still top notch. Period.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby MattyO on Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:14 am

yer im not too concerned about the AF points, as for still shots i usually just use centre and re-compose.

Im more worried about the actual accuracy and tracking of highspeed moving objects... ie superbikes! :)

would the d300 be able to match the d2xs levels of performance in this department
MattyO
mattyo@mattyo.com.au
http://www.mattyo.com.au

WA Contributer for Circlework.com.au - Motorsports and Events Photography
http://www.circlework.com.au
CAMS Accreditated

D300, D200, 300 f2.8 VR, 70-200 f2.8 VR, 17-55 f2.8, 1.4x, 1.7x, SB800, SB600
User avatar
MattyO
Member
 
Posts: 340
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 7:55 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Postby gstark on Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:01 am

MattyO wrote:would the d300 be able to match the d2xs levels of performance in this department


I think that's a question you need to answer yourself, taking into account that the D300 and the D3 share the same AF system.

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby ATJ on Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:12 am

While birds in flight is not exactly the same as motor sports, both need fast and accurate focusing:

http://www.naturescapes.net/phpBB2/view ... p?t=120850
User avatar
ATJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:44 am
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW

Re: Please talk me out of it!

Postby chrisk on Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:20 am

Yi-P wrote:excessive amounts of focus points.


as long as you can switch to less focus pts for portrait work etc then there is no such thing as excessive amounts of focus points.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby methd on Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:40 pm

I was a bit bored the other evening so I decided to shoot seagulls in flight. It was after 9pm, the sun had already gone below the horizon and they really blended into the background.

The D3 (shares the same AF system with the D300) was extremely impressive. Set on continuous servo, focus release and 9 points, it was hitting well over 95% in perfect focus, and i would think the other 5% was user error.

These have been unedited or uncropped except the last to show 100% crop. They're all at ISO 800, aperture priority set at f/2.8. I also tried to make it harder for the camera by selecting gulls that were further away (less than 5% of the entire frame) just to see if the camera 'knew' what i wanted to focus on. The lens was the 24-70 (yes, there is vignetting at 24mm wide open :P ) ... sorry for the spamming!

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

This shot impresses me the most of the camera and I have quite a few of them. The seagull is tiny compared to the size of the frame, yet the D3 manages to focus on it, despite the background which is very similar to the seagull.

Image

And here is 100% crop of the same image.

Image
http://www.lumensphotography.com
Nikon gear. D3x, D3s, D3 ... and lots of lenses.
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby Ivanerrol on Wed Jan 09, 2008 4:50 pm

Hi Methd, I like that number 5 shot.

Flaps down, landing gear down, runway in line, down in 20 seconds, just missing is his landing lights. :)
User avatar
Ivanerrol
Member
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: Ivanhoe Melbourne Australia

Postby blacknstormy on Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:05 pm

Wow - in pretty trying conditions that is really pretty good !!!!
Why can't I win Lotto !!!!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby methd on Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:36 pm

Ivanerrol wrote:Hi Methd, I like that number 5 shot.

Flaps down, landing gear down, runway in line, down in 20 seconds, just missing is his landing lights. :)
\

hhaah :)

yeh i was only testing the AF system so they arent really great shots. I was actually shooting a beach landscape and thought i might as well test the AF since there's gulls flying around.
http://www.lumensphotography.com
Nikon gear. D3x, D3s, D3 ... and lots of lenses.
User avatar
methd
Member
 
Posts: 483
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC.

Postby chrisk on Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:32 pm

methd, those gull shots are awesome. great work.
EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75 l AW1 l V3
User avatar
chrisk
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3317
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:50 pm
Location: Oyster Bay, Sydney

Postby johnd on Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:23 am

Great shots Methd. Dust bunny lower right hand of frame. I got one too on my D3. You'd think these new bodies would stay dust bunny free. :wink:

MattyO, I can only compare with the D200 not the D2Xs. But the AF on the D3 is very accurate and amazingly fast focus tracking compared with the D200. I believe the identical system is in the D300. A lot of people are talking about the D300 as a D2XS replacement. Another thing, the skin tones are just delicious straight out of the camera.

Cheers
John
D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
User avatar
johnd
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Sandy Bay, Tas.

Postby Antsl on Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:09 am

Hi Matty,
If it is any help to you ... David Dare Parker was on the billing in Sydney the other month to help launch the D3 and D300. Like me, he has been working with the D200 for the past couple of years and he reckoned that the D300 he was testing for the launch was a lot better at focussing than the D200. He reckons he has been unhappy with the D200 AF but I have to say that I have not had that many issues with it.
Good luck on the decision! Antsl
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Postby bwhinnen on Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:48 am

Even if they iron out the little niggles with the D200 AF system it would be good.

Personally I think the D300 would be better than the D2Xs, but I still think D3 a little further down the track :D
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane


Return to Nikon