Recommendations on a good prime for portraiture...

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Recommendations on a good prime for portraiture...

Postby Kyle on Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:25 pm

Hi all :)

I'm having trouble deciding on a decent prime for portrait photos.

I had my heart set on a 50mm f1.4. but have heard some average reports on it. :?

Has anyone had any bad experiences with this lens?

Or even good ones? :)

Thoughts/suggestions/flaming for not searching most welcome :)
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Re: Recommendations on a good prime for portraiture...

Postby myarhidia on Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:34 pm

Kyle wrote:I had my heart set on a 50mm f1.4. but have heard some average reports on it. :?


Really? I've only heard good things about it. From what I have read/know, the 85/f1.4 is the ideal portrait lens @ over 3 times the price of the above. :lol:
Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
User avatar
myarhidia
Member
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Kingsgrove, Sydney, So where the bloody hell are you?

Postby Geoff on Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:38 pm

The 50mm 1.4 is a pearler of a lens, having said that I recently tried Yi-p's 35mm F2 which was also VERY nice.

The 50mm 1.4 (or even 1.8 ) is a right place to start in the search for a good portrait lens.

I'm currently trying to justify the illustrious 85mm 1.4 :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Kyle on Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:49 pm

Thanks for the info fellas :)

Out of the 35mm and 50mm, optically which one might be better? :?

Also, The sigma 30mm f1.4 hsm, wouldit be a worthy contender? :?


:)
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Matt. K on Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:51 pm

For full length portraits you can't beat the 50mm. For head and shoulders then the 85mm.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby LOZ on Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:05 am

Kyle

Keep your eyes open for a second hand 85 1:8 they are about 10 to 18 ? years old they are a great lens . I purchased mine last year for $100


LOZ
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby MCWB on Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:18 am

Depends how long you want to go, and why you want a prime! If you're getting the 70-200 VR, that makes a pretty nice portrait lens (although big and heavy). I recently got an AI 105 f/2.5 that's pretty nice, its newer brother the 105 DC is a corker! Add to that the standard 85 f/1.4 and 50 f/1.4. The Sigma 30 f/1.4 looks interesting, I just bought one second hand so we'll see how it goes. :)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Kyle on Wed Aug 30, 2006 12:22 am

MCWB wrote:Depends how long you want to go, and why you want a prime! If you're getting the 70-200 VR, that makes a pretty nice portrait lens (although big and heavy). I recently got an AI 105 f/2.5 that's pretty nice, its newer brother the 105 DC is a corker! Add to that the standard 85 f/1.4 and 50 f/1.4. The Sigma 30 f/1.4 looks interesting, I just bought one second hand so we'll see how it goes. :)


Bosk's? :P

Bastard :D
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby xorl on Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:06 am

The 50mm f/1.4 is an excellent lens. I've found it is very useful on digital as a great multi-purpose lens. Highly recommended. However, some people might find it a little wide for head shots. I think it's ok. People often use the 85mm on film for portraits, the 50mm has a 75mm field of view on digital, which is still close.

If you want something longer consider the 85mm f/1.8. The 85mm f/1.4 is awesome, but expensive. Another alternative is the 105mm f/2.8 AF-D Micro-Nikkor. I use the 105mm along with the 50mm for portraits, depending on desired perspective and FoV.
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby Glen on Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:53 am

Kyle,

not sure if you are talking Nikon or Canon, but if talking Nikon as Matt said you cant go past the 50 and 85mm lens, in either 1.8 or 1.4, all are excellent. The other choice if you want good bokeh on a metering manual is the 45P :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby padey on Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:33 am

My primary lens choices are the 28 and 85mm.

Here is an 28 f1.4
Image

Here is an 85 f1.4
Image

I have a 50mm but I don’t use it as much, just because I just don’t find that length as desirable as the wide or tele.

If you are budget conscious, there are plenty of f2.8 primes around the 25-35 range and you can get an 85 f1.8 or an older AIS 85f1.4 for good prices.
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby Wocka on Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:53 am

I have the Sigma 30mm 1.4. Absolutely love it. Fantastic indoors.

Image
Warwick
=======
Canon 40D : 350D
Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
User avatar
Wocka
Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Northern Beaches

Postby Kyle on Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:02 am

Thanks Andrew and wocka :D :up:

Down to the 28f1.4 nikon and 30f1.4 sigma now :)

wocka, how quick is the sigma on focus?
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw

Postby Wocka on Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:10 am

Kyle,

I don't have a lot to compare to, but I find it very quick and quiet.

Last night (after changing to the Sigma) I focused from the lounge room to the kitchen wall (difference of about 3.5m) and actually had to test it twice because the focus shifted extremely quickly and quietly.

Cheers,
Warwick
=======
Canon 40D : 350D
Canon 18-55mm : Canon 75-300mm IS USM : Sigma 30mm EX HSM DC 1.4 : Sigma 10-20mm
User avatar
Wocka
Member
 
Posts: 472
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Northern Beaches

Postby padey on Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:36 am

Kyle wrote:Thanks Andrew and wocka :D :up:

Down to the 28f1.4 nikon and 30f1.4 sigma now :)

wocka, how quick is the sigma on focus?


You may want to check the price first. The last 28mm f1.4 i saw go on ebay went for $2700.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... %3AIT&rd=1
Andrew


Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
padey
Member
 
Posts: 464
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
Location: Sydney, Hills Area

Postby Kyle on Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:59 am

eeek... lol.. Wrong one :P Might head down to ecs and have a play with some lenses this weekend :)

I meant to say the 24mm f2.8 i think.. :?
User avatar
Kyle
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:28 pm
Location: Penrith, nsw


Return to Nikon