Nikon 105 micro VR....anyone?

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Nikon 105 micro VR....anyone?

Postby flipfrog on Wed Apr 05, 2006 11:48 am

anyone have it? played with it? or heard good/bad things about it?

i know both the 60 and 105 (non VR) are great lenses, but now comes this new nikon macro.....
User avatar
flipfrog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 626
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:33 pm
Location: Vancouver Canada

Postby avkomp on Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:41 pm

I have the 105 non VR

I wont be rushing to upgrade,
seems to me that a lot of closeup stuff may well be executed on a tripod rendering vr redundant

If you look on the forums, you will see some wonderfully sharp images executed with the 105 micro as it is.

am I the only one who thinks this is probably unnecessary??

steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby Mj on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:02 pm

avkomp wrote:am I the only one who thinks this is probably unnecessary??


Nope... not the only one. Been some discussion on this elsewhere here.
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby Paul on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:06 pm

Mj wrote:Nope... not the only one. Been some discussion on this elsewhere here.

Maybe here.. :D
http://www.dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php?t=14637&highlight=105++macro
Nikon F80D, FM2n
RRS BH-55, 055XPROB
Smugmug
User avatar
Paul
Senior Member
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:32 am
Location: Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia

Postby jben_net on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:21 pm

KenRockwell reviewed the Nikon 105mm f/2.8GED-IF AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor and wrote:

“I tried three samples at PMA 2006. All of them didn’t autofocus very well on my D200. They would often not get good focus, so the green focus confirmation dot in the lower left of the finder wouldn’t light, so the shutter wouldn’t release in S mode. This is bad. My old 105 mm AF, not even D, focuses much more reliably

Pass on it and get the older 105 mm f/2.8 AF instead. That older lens sells for $700 and this new one sells for $830. I’m hoping the focus issue I saw will go away. I’ll let you know if I try it again.”
User avatar
jben_net
Member
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:26 am
Location: Newcastle

Postby avkomp on Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:25 pm

I like my non vr 105 micro. razor sharp although not quite as sharp as the micro 60 (not much in it though.)

Steve
check out my image gallery @
http://photography.avkomp.com/gallery3
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

vr 105

Postby mentieth on Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:55 am

Well I'm just back from my favourite photogear shop. I'd just about convinced myself the vr was worth the extra $$$'s, plus the build quality, silent fast AF, etc. The shop assistant talked me out of it. Now in HK they'd sell you you're old grannies' finger nail clippings so this took me aback. OK I said, can I try the Tamron 90mm? No chance, they are sold as soon as they arrive and you'll have to wait at least 2 weeks before the next order comes in. He'd ordered 20 and reckons he'll be lucky to get 5. Such is the demand. If anything, Honkies are smart buyers. I'm waiting in line for the Tamron.
mentieth
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:37 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Yi-P on Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:25 am

Have you checked this out before?

http://dslrusers.net/viewtopic.php?t=20164
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield


Return to Nikon