Review of new Nikkor 24-70 lens

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Review of new Nikkor 24-70 lens

Postby radar on Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:45 pm

Hi,

Nærfoto Bjørn Rørslett reviews the 24-70:

http://www.naturfotograf.com/lens_zoom_ ... AFS24-70FX

Sounds like a very nice lens 8) 8) 8)

cheers,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby Killakoala on Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:08 pm

He certainly gives it high praise and his review makes it sound nice. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby stubbsy on Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:15 pm

Thanks for the Link André - especially given it's from my most trusted reviewer. It seems the 28-70/2.8 may have had it's day from reading this.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby radar on Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:28 pm

stubbsy wrote:It seems the 28-70/2.8 may have had it's day from reading this.


Maybe Nikon made a better "28-70" but the old 28-70 isn't exactly throw away material :D
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000

Postby Nnnnsic on Sun Sep 09, 2007 4:30 pm

I didn't like how it felt in comparison to the 28-70 to be honest. :P
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Onyx on Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:35 am

http://www.pictchallenge-archives.net/T ... 42470.html

Sample images from 24-70 as well as 14-24.

14mm on FX is W-i-i-i-i-d-e!
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Andyt on Mon Sep 17, 2007 10:00 pm

radar wrote:
stubbsy wrote:It seems the 28-70/2.8 may have had it's day from reading this.


Maybe Nikon made a better "28-70" but the old 28-70 isn't exactly throw away material :D


I will second that, after purchasing the 18-200 VR (a versatile and great walk around / travelling lens) when you want that bit extra, on goes the 28-70 F2.8! :D The plan was to sell this and the 70-200VR, but having been spoilt with the focus speed and quality I am gamely hanging on to them :lol:
User avatar
Andyt
Member
 
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:17 pm
Location: Port Hedland North Western Australia


Return to Nikon