So - why wasn't the D3 called D3H?
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:39 am
After all, it has all the hallmarks of an H. It sports superfast processing and a low-res, large photo-site sensor. With "low-res" I'm referring to the only very slightly increased pixel density of the sensor (5MP vs 4MP of the D2H in the DX format).
I'm sure there will be a D3X (or D3s) in due course, but for me as a D2H loving gearhead with no discernible photographic vision but a hell of a lot of technology appreciation the D3 sounds just about perfect.
That said, I have to take my D2H for service, the AF is off...
Cheers
Steffen.
I'm sure there will be a D3X (or D3s) in due course, but for me as a D2H loving gearhead with no discernible photographic vision but a hell of a lot of technology appreciation the D3 sounds just about perfect.
That said, I have to take my D2H for service, the AF is off...
Cheers
Steffen.