So - why wasn't the D3 called D3H?
 Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:39 am
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 4:39 amAfter all, it has all the hallmarks of an H. It sports superfast processing and a low-res, large photo-site sensor. With "low-res" I'm referring to the only very slightly increased pixel density of the sensor (5MP vs 4MP of the D2H in the DX format).
I'm sure there will be a D3X (or D3s) in due course, but for me as a D2H loving gearhead with no discernible photographic vision but a hell of a lot of technology appreciation the D3 sounds just about perfect.
That said, I have to take my D2H for service, the AF is off... 
 
Cheers
Steffen.
			I'm sure there will be a D3X (or D3s) in due course, but for me as a D2H loving gearhead with no discernible photographic vision but a hell of a lot of technology appreciation the D3 sounds just about perfect.
That said, I have to take my D2H for service, the AF is off...
 
 
Cheers
Steffen.
 , that Nikon were moving away from x ie. D2x, and xs ie. D2xs, so the same may also apply to H.
, that Nikon were moving away from x ie. D2x, and xs ie. D2xs, so the same may also apply to H.
 I think the last time I saw H advertised on TV was for Preperation H, a haemorrhoid creme, quite some years ago.
 I think the last time I saw H advertised on TV was for Preperation H, a haemorrhoid creme, quite some years ago.
 No truth in advertising requirements then
  No truth in advertising requirements then  