the D3 - the 24-70 - and meModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
the D3 - the 24-70 - and meYes we're getting very close - that is, me and my new kit.
Went for a walk down the strip tonight to try auto ISO ( set a ceiling ISO with auto, a fixed aperture and a minimum floor shutter speed ) Here are some results:- Semos Morrocan Restaurant - f2.8 : 1/60s : ISO2500 : 58mm Gelatisimo - f2.8 : 1/250s : ISO800 : 24mm Klingers Menswear - f2.8 : 1/60s : ISO2800 : 24mm Zink Bar - f2.8 : 1/30s : ISO6400 : 56mm Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
........ are you sleeping with it yet....... as it seems that you do not go out alone.......
control the whites and you have it nailed....... Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
I like the idea of a truly usable auto ISO. That feature will be fantastic for sports photographs and the like.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
What are you thoughts on the 24-70 ??? I'm still deciding between the 28 and 24 to 70. So the more feedback the better! I'd love a D3 too, but maybe next year.
Craig,
I sold - 10.5 fiseye, 12-24 dx, 17-35, and 28-70 (all nikon) I bought - 14-24 and 24-70 to replace above for the D3 The 17-35 and 28-70 were outstanding lenses but in my opinion, and others more qualified, the newer lenses are at another level. The 24-70 is a G Type lens so if that doesn't bother you I'd go the 24-70 - I think it's cheaper anyway Bob G Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
So you don't have any qualms about the build quality of the 24-70 (on all accounts the glass is great, but "it looks cheaper") I've yet to hold one so I don't know.
Bobs 24-70 is a lot lighter and less bulky than my 28-70, and it does have the convex front lens which will call for you to be very careful. From a very short play with it though it is certainly sharp, as of course is the beast.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"
D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
The lens is -tack- sharp, one just needs to know how to use it
I've been using shots straight out of the camera without any sharpening added. Here's an example (sorry for the hijack!).. no sharpening applied at all (and none in camera either). Last edited by methd on Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.
MethD
Nice shot and sharp as a tack. It is an exceptional zoom with the quality of a good prime lens This shot was taken at 3200 iso and whilst it has a narrow DOF and was focused on the bridge of his nose and toward the right eye it does show the sharpness in his moustache. Bob
"Wake up and smell the pixels!"
Would u guys PLEASE stop it?
Geoff
Special Moments Photography Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
Previous topic • Next topic
13 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|