AF-S 24-85mm - your thoughts?

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

AF-S 24-85mm - your thoughts?

Postby Antsl on Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:01 pm

Hi All

I was wondering if anyone has a Nikkor AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G IF-ED and if so, what are your thoughts on the lens.

I am thinking of getting it for use with a new FF camera that I might be getting soon. The most common lenses I use are wides and teles and so this focal range is not a priority for me (read this as - I do not really need to carry around a large 24-70mm f2.8 if I can help it and I can also save myself $2000). Thoughts and considerations most welcome!

Cheers for now,
Ants
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Re: AF-S 24-85mm - your thoughts?

Postby Yi-P on Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:37 pm

Antsl wrote:I am thinking of getting it for use with a new FF camera that I might be getting soon.


Wouldn't 2 characters "D3" would explain that all??? :lol:

Have you considered the 24-120mm VR? Bit more versatile for the FF and it has VR. I know Gary has one and its not bad for its money and quality. Fits just right on a FF and not so on DX...
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Antsl on Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:28 am

Hi Yi-P

Yes.... I have got me a D3 on the way... it is such a useful camera for the low light photography that I do that I really have to have one. As the camera is quite a bit heavier than my current D200 and because it is going to have at least a three stop advantage I am thinking I will get a smaller mid range lens to save some weight.

For the moment I have been using a Sigma 24-70 f2.8 but I find it to be rather bulky and heavy, (no doubt no more bulkier than Nikons equivalent lenses). Because the D3 is full frame my usual favourite lenses... the 20-35 and the 80-200 are going to be back in their usual slots and I do not need a mid range zoom to cover the short telephoto range (the 55-80 range). I also often work with just a belt pack and a mix of lenses and so sometimes small is an advangtage.

I have had a look at Nikons range at the moment and figured the 24-85 was the best comprise of weight and zoom range. I would not go for the 24-120 VR, in part because I do not need VR but also because I prefer shorter zoom factors (more chance they will get everything right).

Still keen to hear from some users!
Cheers, Ants
User avatar
Antsl
Senior Member
 
Posts: 678
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 1:22 am
Location: North Melbourne, Victoria!

Postby Yi-P on Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:22 am

You might want to have a look at this first? (If you haven't done so)

http://www.bythom.com/2485lens.htm

Sorry I cant say anything about this lens because I haven't even seen one around yet...
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield


Return to Nikon