Nikon 70-200/2.8...

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby Remorhaz on Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:41 pm

Hi - I've been tossing up for some time about getting a Nikon 70-200/2.8 (either VRI or VRII - I'd probably prefer the VRII but if the price on a VRI was good enough...)

I'd be using it on my D7000 (crop) for now but I guess possibly moving to full frame one day - who knows... I also already own a TC-14e II (which I can currently use with exactly zero of my existing lenses :))

I'm thinking of getting one second hand or maybe even getting one grey (e.g. you can get them (VRII) for about $2100 + delivery + customs? online at the moment or $2500 walk into DDP) - so I was just wondering what people thought would be a good/fair price for each version (VR and VRII) second hand - e.g. what would be a fair break even price where if I paid less I'd be getting a bargain and if I paid more I'd be paying too much (obviously age, lens condition, remaining warranty might come into play).

and of course if anyone has one they'd be interesting in offering me... :)
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby Geoff M on Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:39 pm

I have the VR1 version which I purchased second hand off eBay about 12 months ago for $1600. It was, and still is, in immaculate condition (no, it's not for sale). I love it and it performs wonderfully on my D90. By all accounts the VR1 version is not quite as good on a FX body, the VRII is the better option.

I would guess that $1400- $1800 would be the going rate for a used VR1 version in good to excellent condition.
Fuji X-Pro1 | X-E1 | X-T1 | XF14 | XF23 | XF27 | XF35 | XF56 | XF60 | XF10-24 | XF18-55 | XF55-200 | MCEX-11

http://gmarshall.zenfolio.com

http://xtographer.weebly.com
User avatar
Geoff M
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:54 pm
Location: Tamborine Mountain QLD.

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby aim54x on Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:06 pm

I have a VRI that I have used both on DX and on film. Stunning lens, and from the time I have used it on D700/D3 it has performed well enough for no one to notice the weaknesses of this lens on FX. This is however a lens I both love and loathe though. It simply does not see enough use for me to justify keeping it (along with my 24-70) but whenever I do use it I decide again that I cannot part with it. I love the quality, but loathe the size and weight.....
Cameron
Nikon F/Nikon 1 | Hasselblad V/XPAN| Leica M/LTM |Sony α/FE/E/Maxxum/M42
Wishlist Nikkor 24/85 f/1.4| Fuji Natura Black
Scout-Images | Flickr | 365Project
User avatar
aim54x
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7305
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:13 pm
Location: Penshurst, Sydney

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby Mr Darcy on Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:25 pm

I have the VRII and all I can say is that it is simply flawless on crop. From what I have read, it is pretty close to flawless on FX as well, but cannot speak to that.
Like Cameron, I don't really use it enough to justify its existence, but the times I do use it mean I will not part with it.
I bought it with one on on a possible future with a FX body. Without that in the back of my mind, I am sure the VRI would be more than good enough.

I cannot comment on pricing, but I suspect it is one of those lenses that will hold its value, so price is really irrelevant, as long as you can afford it, as you will be able to recoup its price into the future. I cannot see very many of these beauties hitting the second hand market. There will only be the odd "I am sick of Nikon" seller and a few worn out ex-journo ones, and that' all.
Greg
It's easy to be good... when there is nothing else to do
User avatar
Mr Darcy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3414
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:35 pm
Location: The somewhat singed and blackened Blue Mountains

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby Jeff on Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:42 pm

I purchased the VR 11 version recently. It replaced the Sigma version that I had for about 5yrs. While my Sigma was a good one the new Nikon is fantastic . It is such an improvement that I can hardly believe the difference.

Jeff
User avatar
Jeff
Senior Member
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Terrey Hills

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby Sylvia on Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:51 pm

I am selling my VR1 if anyone is interested.
Shoot me a pm.
I just don't use it anymore. Great lens but now redundant to my needs.
Nikons.
Nikkor's.
User avatar
Sylvia
Member
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:46 pm
Location: Central Coast

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby surenj on Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:59 pm

Rodney, I think you are about to develop some new muscles in your left hand... :mrgreen:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby Remorhaz on Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:33 pm

surenj wrote:Rodney, I think you are about to develop some new muscles in your left hand... :mrgreen:


Well I'm certainly hoping so - although this is going to require a new camera bag as well - sigh...

I checked out some of the Kata's (Bug & Bumblebee) with Cameron and Marcus earlier today
D600, D7000, Nikon/Sigma/Tamron Lenses, Nikon Flashes, Sirui/Manfrotto/Benro Sticks
Rodney - My Photo Blog
Want: Fast Wide (14|20|24)
User avatar
Remorhaz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2547
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Lower North Shore - D600

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby surenj on Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:26 pm

Remorhaz wrote:this is going to require a new camera bag as well

Perhaps also a new dry cabinet... Good luck with your buy. :cheers:
User avatar
surenj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7197
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: Artarmon NSW

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 pm

surenj wrote:
Remorhaz wrote:this is going to require a new camera bag as well

Perhaps also a new dry cabinet... Good luck with your buy. :cheers:
 LOL see Thread Here
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Re: Nikon 70-200/2.8...

Postby radar on Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:12 pm

I've got the VR I version and it is in excellent condition. I use it on my D7000 and D700 and certainly haven't had any issues with either. It is a great lens. I am considering upgrading to the VR II but probably won't be for 1-2 months. So if you haven't picked up one by then, shoot me a PM and I'll let you know if I'm upgrading.

For a cropped sensor camera there is not meant to be much difference in the quality that most people would notice. It's when you got to full-frame that you start noticing more. And you get the latest version of VR II and Nano crystal.

Reason I will be selling is due to going to the higher resolution cameras, eg D800 8) when it gets released.

cheers,

André
Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams

(misc Nikon stuff)
User avatar
radar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:18 am
Location: Lake Macquarie (Newcastle) - D700, D7000


Return to Nikon