Mr Darcy wrote:biggerry wrote:is it because he is shooting thru a thick pane of window glass?
I think that is part of it, but another factor is 1/60s shutter speed. Even on a tripod, this is more than a little slow for an 1350mm equivalent.It is telling, I think that the couple on the bridge are much better and there the shutter speed is 1/250s. At that focal length, you are also going to have issues with heat haze, road vibration, wave action on the pier, etc etc.
I have to say though that none of these photos do anything to sell me the V1 as a cheap way into the world of super telephoto. Much as I would like to go there.
photohiker wrote:The geek in me finds it awesome, but the samples posted are less so.
Greg has nailed it with his shutter speed observations. That was about the first thing I noticed when shooting with the 80-400 on the V1, and I think I mentioned as such.
You seriously need to keep an eye on your technique, and the thick glass will also be less than useful here. I think the examples are good, in terms of showing some potential, rather than anything else. Certainly, the V1's sensor is up to the mark, and the glass is certainly very high quality.
And no, when you consider the cost of the 500mm lens, this is not a cheap way into the world of super telephoto.
Reschsmooth wrote:Why not just get the D800 and crop down to 10.1 MP - I wonder what effective focal length that would create?
One of the video
modes on the D800 is a 2.7 crop factor .... I'll let you do the math, but I don't think that's a coincidence.